Sansing et al v. Patterson et al
Filing
50
ORDER: Pursuant to the 49 Stipulation for Dismissal With Prejudice of Claims, the claims asserted by Plaintiff Jody Sansing against Defendant John Patterson shall be dismissed with prejudice, each party to pay their own fees and costs, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 1/10/2014. (eseam)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
LEWIS T. BABCOCK, JUDGE
Civil Case No. 13-cv-00696-LTB-MEH
JODY SANSING,
MICHELLE EDWARDSON, and
SUZANNE ROGERS,
Plaintiffs,
v.
JOHN PATTERSON, individually, and
CITY OF CHERRY HILLS VILLAGE,
Defendants.
________________________________________________________________________
ORDER
________________________________________________________________________
THIS MATTER coming before the Court on the Stipulation for Dismissal With
Prejudice of Claims of Jody Sansing Against John Patterson (Doc 49 - filed January 9,
2014), and the Court being fully advised in the premises, it is therefore
ORDERED that the claims asserted by Plaintiff Jody Sansing against Defendant
John Patterson shall be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, each party to pay their own fees
and costs.
BY THE COURT:
s/Lewis T. Babcock
Lewis T. Babcock, Judge
DATED:
January 10, 2014
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?