Sansing et al v. Patterson et al

Filing 50

ORDER: Pursuant to the 49 Stipulation for Dismissal With Prejudice of Claims, the claims asserted by Plaintiff Jody Sansing against Defendant John Patterson shall be dismissed with prejudice, each party to pay their own fees and costs, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 1/10/2014. (eseam)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
LEWIS T. BABCOCK, JUDGE
Civil Case No. 13-cv-00696-LTB-MEH
JODY SANSING,
MICHELLE EDWARDSON, and
SUZANNE ROGERS,
Plaintiffs,
v.
JOHN PATTERSON, individually, and
CITY OF CHERRY HILLS VILLAGE,
Defendants.
________________________________________________________________________
ORDER
________________________________________________________________________

THIS MATTER coming before the Court on the Stipulation for Dismissal With
Prejudice of Claims of Jody Sansing Against John Patterson (Doc 49 - filed January 9,
2014), and the Court being fully advised in the premises, it is therefore
ORDERED that the claims asserted by Plaintiff Jody Sansing against Defendant
John Patterson shall be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, each party to pay their own fees
and costs.
BY THE COURT:

s/Lewis T. Babcock
Lewis T. Babcock, Judge
DATED:

January 10, 2014