Wilson v. Astrue

Filing 14

JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES (ORDER). SS Plaintiffs Brief due by 7/15/2013. SS Defendants Brief due by 8/14/2013. SS Plaintiffs Reply Brief due by 8/29/2013. By Judge John L. Kane on 6/6/13. (mnfsl, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 13-cv-699-AP
SHERRI L. WILSON,
Plaintiff,
v.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, ACTING COMMISIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,
Defendant.

JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES

1.

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES
For Plaintiff:
Brett M. Busch, Esq.
Busch Law Offices
903 N. Cleveland Ave., Suite A
Loveland, CO 80537
[phone]
Fax [phone]
[e-mail]
For Defendant:
John F. Walsh
United States Attorney
J. Benedict García
Assistant United States Attorney
United States Attorney’s Office
District of Colorado
Michael S. Howard, Esq.
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Assistant Regional Counsel
Office of the General Counsel
Social Secuurity Administration
1001 Seventeenth Street
Denver, CO 80202
[phone]
-1-

2.

STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION

The Court has jurisdiction based on section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 405(g).
3.

DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS
A.
B.

Date Complaint Was Served on U.S. Attorney's Office: March 21, 2013

C.
4.

Date Complaint Was Filed: March 18, 2013

Date Answer and Administrative Record Were Filed: May 17, 2013

STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD

There are no issues with the accuracy or completeness of the administrative record.
5.

STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE

None anticipated.
6.

STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASE RAISES UNUSUAL CLAIMS OR
DEFENSES

This case does not involve unusually complicated or out-of the-ordinary claims. There have been
no remands.
7.

OTHER MATTERS

None. This case was not previously remanded by the Court.
8.

BRIEFING SCHEDULE
A.

07/15/13

B.

Defendant’s Response Brief Due:

08/14/13

C.
9.

Plaintiff's Opening Brief Due:

Plaintiff’s Reply Brief (If Any) Due:

08/29/13

STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT
A.

Plaintiff's Statement: Oral argument requested.

B.

Defendant's Statement: Oral argument is not requested.
-2-

10.

CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Indicate below the parties' consent choice.
A.

B.

11.

(

)

(X)

All parties have consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a
United States Magistrate Judge.
All parties have not consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a
United States Magistrate Judge.

AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN

THE PARTIES FILING MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME OR CONTINUANCES MUST
COMPLY WITH D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(C) BY SUBMITTING PROOF THAT A COPY OF THE
MOTION HAS BEEN SERVED UPON THE MOVING ATTORNEY'S CLIENT, ALL ATTORNEYS
OF RECORD, AND ALL PRO SE PARTIES.
The parties agree that the Joint Case Management Plan may be altered or amended only
upon a showing of good cause.
DATED this 6th day of June, 2013.
BY THE COURT:

s/John L. Kane

U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
APPROVED:
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

s/Brett M. Busch

s/ Michael S. Howard

BRETT M. BUSCH, ESQ.
903 N. Cleveland Ave., Suite A
Loveland, CO 80537
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
[e-mail]

MICHAEL S. HOWARD
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Assistant Regional Counsel
Office of the General Counsel
Social Security Administration
1001 Seventeenth Street
Denver, CO 80202
Phone [phone]
[e-mail]

Attorney for Plaintiff

Attorney for Defendant
-3-