Myers et al v. U.S. Bureau of Land Management
Filing
41
ORDER LIFTING STAY: ORDERED that Defendant's response to Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 37) is due within 21 days of the date of this Order, and Plaintiffs reply is due within 14 days after service of Defendants response; and it is FURTHER ORDERED that the parties are to contact Magistrate Judge Boland to reset discovery or other dates in the Scheduling Order necessitated by the October 1, 2013 stay order. by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 10/22/2013. (trlee, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Raymond P. Moore
Civil Action No. 13-cv-00701-RM-BNB
WALTER MYERS,
KATHERINE MYERS,
AMANDA WEAKLAND, and
PATRICK WEAKLAND
Plaintiffs,
v.
BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, an agency of the United States
Defendant.
______________________________________________________________________________
ORDER LIFTING STAY
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
THIS MATTER comes before the Court sua sponte. By order dated October 1, 2013, the
Court granted Defendant’s Motion for Stay in Light of Lapse of Appropriations. As the reasons
which gave rise to the request for a stay no longer exist, and the stay was in place for 22 days, it
is hereby
ORDERED that the stay in this case is lifted; it is
FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant’s response to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary
Judgment (ECF No. 37) is due within 21 days of the date of this Order, and Plaintiff’s reply is
due within 14 days after service of Defendant’s response; and it is
FURTHER ORDERED that the parties are to contact Magistrate Judge Boland to reset
discovery or other dates in the Scheduling Order necessitated by the October 1, 2013 stay order.
DATED this 22nd day of October, 2013.
BY THE COURT:
____________________________________
RAYMOND P. MOORE
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?