Lomax v. Trani et al
FINAL JUDGMENT. re: 43 IT IS ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation 42 is ADOPTED in its entirety.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 39 is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Final Judgment is entered for Defendants and against the Plaintiff and the action and Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint 14 are DISMISSED. Each party shall bear her/his own costs, by Deborah Hansen, deputy clerk, on 4/21/2014. (dhans, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge William J. Martínez
Civil Action No. 13-cv-00707-WJM-KMT
ARTHUR JAMES LOMAX,
JAMES LANDER (FCF),
NATHAN WIGGIN (FCF),
M. SCHNELL (FCF),
IVETTE RUIZ (AVCF),
PENNY SPEARING (AVCF),
MS. PRIESTLY (AVCF),
MS. APODACA (AVCF), and
MR. MCGILL (AVCF),
Pursuant to and in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a), all previous Orders
entered in this case, and the Order Adopting March 18, 2014 Recommendation of
Magistrate Judge and Granting Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, entered by the
Honorable William J. Martínez, United States District Judge, on April 21, 2014,
IT IS ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation (ECF No. 42) is
ADOPTED in its entirety.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 39) is
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Final Judgment is entered for Defendants and
against the Plaintiff and the action and Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint
(ECF No. 14) are DISMISSED. Each party shall bear her/his own costs.
Dated at Denver, Colorado, this
21st day of April 2014.
BY THE COURT:
JEFFREY P. COLWELL, CLERK
By: Deborah A. Hansen
Deborah A. Hansen, Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?