Pinson v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al

Filing 55

ORDER striking 50 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. The plaintiff shall cease filing redundant and inappropriate motions in this case (and all other cases) and Failure to comply with this order may result in sanctions, including dismissal of this case with prejudice. by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 11/14/2013.(trlee, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland Civil Action No. 13-cv-00749-RM-BNB JEREMY PINSON, Plaintiff, v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, ANTHONY OSAGIE, DAVID ALLRED, CHRISTOPHER WILSON, LISA GREGORY, DAVID BERKEBILE, and D. HALL, Defendants. ______________________________________________________________________________ ORDER ______________________________________________________________________________ This matter arises on the plaintiff’s Verified Emergency Motion for TRO/and Preliminary Injunction / Evidentiary Hearing Requested With Expedited Consideration [Doc. #50, filed 11/08/2013] (the “Motion). The Motion is STRICKEN. The plaintiff is incarcerated by the Federal Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”) at the United States Penitentiary-Administrative Maximum in Florence, Colorado (“ADX”). The plaintiff is proceeding in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 and has been assessed three strikes under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) because he is an abusive filer.1 The plaintiff’s Motion seeks the same relief as a motion for injunctive relief [Doc. #16] 1 The plaintiff’s abusive filing history is addressed in Civil Action No. 13-cv-01384-RMBNB, Document #5, and is obvious from Attachment A to the Complaint in that case [Doc. #1, pp. 9-14] which lists approximately 125 previous cases filed by the plaintiff. and supplement [Doc. #20] filed previously by the plaintiff and set for hearing by the court [Doc. #51]. The plaintiff may not file redundant motions. IT IS ORDERED: 1. The plaintiff’s Verified Emergency Motion for TRO/and Preliminary Injunction / Evidentiary Hearing Requested With Expedited Consideration [Doc. #50] is STRICKEN; 2. The plaintiff shall cease filing redundant and inappropriate motions in this case (and all other cases); and 3. Failure to comply with this order may result in sanctions, including dismissal of this case with prejudice. Dated November 14, 2013. BY THE COURT: s/ Boyd N. Boland United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?