Grady v. Brodersen

Filing 106

ORDER denying 64 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; denying 65 Motion for Summary Judgment. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 04/28/2015. (athom, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Robert E. Blackburn
Civil Action No. 13-cv-00752-REB-NYW
JAMES S. GRADY, d/b/a Group Five Photosports,
Plaintiff,
v.
EVAN BRODERSEN, a/k/a EFAN BRUDER, and
JOHN DOES 1-5,
Defendants.

ORDER DENYING MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Blackburn, J.
The matters before me are (1) Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment
[#65]1 filed November 14, 2014; and (2) defendant Evan Brodersen’s Motion for Partial
Summary Judgment [#64] filed November 14, 2014. Responses [#72 & #74] to the
motions and a reply [#77] in support of the motion of the plaintiff were filed. I deny both
motions.
I have jurisdiction over this case under 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (federal question) and
28 U.S.C. § 1338(a) (copyright). I have reviewed the summary judgment motions, the
responses, and the reply and have considered the apposite arguments, authorities, and
evidence presented by the parties. Given that review, it is apparent that there exist
genuine disputes of material fact that are not appropriate for summary resolution.

1

“[#65]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a
specific paper by the court’s case management and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). I use this
convention throughout this order.

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:
1. That Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment [#65] filed November 14,
2014, is denied; and
2. That defendant Evan Brodersen’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment
[#64] filed November 14, 2014, is denied.
Dated April 28, 2015, at Denver, Colorado.
BY THE COURT:

2