Grady v. Brodersen

Filing 113

ORDER OF DISMISSAL: The 112 Stipulated Motion to Dismiss with prejudice is granted. This action is dismissed with prejudice with the parties to pay their own attorney fees and costs. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 4/30/2015. (alowe)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Robert E. Blackburn Civil Action No. 13-cv-00752-REB-NYW JAMES S. GRADY, d/b/a GROUP FIVE PHOTOSPORTS, Plaintiff, v. EVAN BRODERSEN, a/k/a EFAN BRUDER, and JOHN DOES 1-5, Defendants. ORDER OF DISMISSAL Blackburn, J. The matter is before me on the Stipulated Motion To Dismiss with Prejudice [#112]1 filed April 30, 2015. After careful review of the motion and the file, I conclude that the motion should be granted and that this action should be dismissed with prejudice. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows: 1. That the Stipulated Motion To Dismiss with Prejudice is granted; 2. That all other pending motions, including but not limited to [#96], are denied as moot; 3. That with the consent of United States Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang, the motion hearing before Magistrate Judge Wang set for June 10, 2015, is vacated; 4. That the combined Final Pretrial Conference/Trial Preparation Conference set 1 “[#112]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific paper by the court’s case management and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). I use this convention throughout this order. for May 1, 2015, is vacated; 5. That the jury trial set to commence May 4, 2015, is vacated; and 6. That this action is dismissed with prejudice with the parties to pay their own attorney fees and costs. Dated April 30, 2015, at Denver, Colorado. BY THE COURT: 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?