Smith v. Giconni

Filing 4

ORDER of Dismissal. ORDERED that the action is dismissed without prejudice. Leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is denied without prejudice, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 5/1/13. (sgrim)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 13-cv-00774-BNB DEMETRICK LEON SMITH, Plaintiff, v. R. GICONNI, SHU/Lieutenant, Defendant. ORDER OF DISMISSAL Plaintiff, Demetrick Leon Smith, is a prisoner in the custody of the United States Bureau of Prisons at the United States Penitentiary, Administrative Maximum, in Florence, Colorado. Mr. Smith initiated this action by filing pro se a document (ECF No. 1) in which he complains that he is being subjected to cruel and unusual punishment. On March 26, 2013, Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland entered an order directing Mr. Smith to cure certain deficiencies if he wished to pursue his claims. Specifically, Magistrate Judge Boland directed Mr. Smith to file a Prisoner Complaint and either to pay the $350.00 filing fee or to file a properly supported motion seeking leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Mr. Smith was warned that the action would be dismissed without further notice if he failed to cure the deficiencies within thirty days. Mr. Smith has failed to cure the deficiencies within the time allowed and he has failed to respond in any way to Magistrate Judge Boland’s March 26 order. Therefore, the action will be dismissed without prejudice for failure to cure the deficiencies. Furthermore, the Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status will be denied for the purpose of appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438 (1962). If Plaintiff files a notice of appeal he also must pay the full $455 appellate filing fee or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis in the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit within thirty days in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 24. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the action is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure because Mr. Smith failed to cure the deficiencies as directed. It is FURTHER ORDERED that leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is denied without prejudice to the filing of a motion seeking leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. DATED at Denver, Colorado, this 1st day of May , 2013. BY THE COURT: s/Lewis T. Babcock LEWIS T. BABCOCK, Senior Judge United States District Court 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?