Avila v. Morales

Filing 48

MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice 46 Respondent's Motion to Withdraw and Notice, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 10/15/2013. (mehcd)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 13-cv-00793-MSK-MEH
ROSAURA ESPINOZA AVILA,
Petitioner,
v.
DAGOBERTO MARRUFO MORALES,
Respondent.

MINUTE ORDER
Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on October 15, 2013.
Respondent’s Motion to Withdraw and Notice [filed October 9, 2013; docket #46] is denied
without prejudice for failure to comply with D.C. Colo. LCivR 7.1A. The Court “will not consider
any motion, other than a motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 or 56, unless counsel for the moving party
or a pro se party, before filing the motion, has conferred or made reasonable, good-faith efforts to
confer with opposing counsel. ” D.C. Colo. LCivR 7.1A (emphasis added). It is the responsibility
of the moving party to “state in the motion, or in a certificate attached to the motion, the specific
efforts to comply with this rule...” Id. The motion does not contain any indication that Plaintiff
attempted to confer with his client or opposing counsel prior to seeking relief from the Court.