Ross v. Gallegos

Filing 28

FINAL JUDGMENT by Clerk in favor of David Gallegos against Delaree Ross re: 27 Order, by Clerk on 12/4/2013. (klyon, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 13-cv-00831-REB-KLM DELAREE ROSS, a/k/a Delise Ross, Plaintiff, v. DAVID GALLEGOS, Aurora P.O., Defendant. FINAL JUDGMENT This Final Judgment is entered pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a) and in accordance with the Order Adopting Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge [#27] entered by Judge Robert E. Blackburn on December 3, 2013, which order is incorporated herein by this reference. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows: 1. That Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge [#25], filed November 14, 2013, is APPROVED and ADOPTED as an order of this court in relevant part as follows; a. That the recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED on the substantive grounds suggested for its recommendation that defendant’s motion to dismiss be granted; and b. That the recommendation is, respectfully, REJECTED to the extent it recommends that plaintiff’s claims be dismissed without prejudice, based on plaintiff’s more recent concession that she has sued the wrong defendant; 2. That Defendant’s Motion To Dismiss Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) [#20], filed is August 21, 2013, is GRANTED; 3. That plaintiff’s claims against defendant are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; 4. That JUDGMENT IS ENTERED in favor of defendant, David Gallegos, Aurora P.O., against plaintiff, Delaree Ross, a/k/a Delise Ross, on all claims for relief and causes of action; and 5. That the defendant is AWARDED his costs to be taxed by the Clerk of the Court pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(d)(1) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 54.1. DATED at Denver, Colorado, this 4th day of December, 2013. FOR THE COURT: Jeffrey P. Colwell, Clerk By: s/Kathleen Finney Kathleen Finney Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?