Gonzales v. Colvin
Filing
14
JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES (ORDER). SS Plaintiffs Brief due by 9/3/2013. SS Defendants Brief due by 10/3/2013. SS Plaintiffs Reply Brief due by 10/18/2013. By Judge John L. Kane on 7/23/13. (mnfsl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 13-cv-00847-AP
ROSALINDA GONZALES,
Plaintiff,
v.
CAROLYN COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES
1. APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES
For Plaintiff:
Rachael A. Lundy
402 W. 12th Street
Pueblo, CO 81003
719-543-8636
719-543-8403 (facsimile)
seckarlaw@mindspring.com
For Defendant:
John F. Walsh
United States Attorney
J. Benedict García
Assistant United States Attorney
United States Attorney’s Office
J.B.Garcia@usdoj.gov
Stephanie Lynn F. Kiley Special Assistant
United States Attorney
Denver, Colorado 80202
303-844-0815
303-844-0770 (facsimile)
Stephanie.kiley@ssa.gov
-1-
2.
STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION
The Court has jurisdiction based on section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 405(g).
3.
DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS
A.
B.
Date Complaint Was Served on U.S. Attorney's Office: May 22, 2013
C.
4.
Date Complaint Was Filed: April 2, 2013
Date Answer and Administrative Record Were Filed: July 16, 2013
STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD
To the best of his knowledge, Plaintiff states that the record is complete and accurate.
To the best of his knowledge, Defendant states that the record is complete and accurate.
5.
STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE
The parties do not anticipate submitting additional evidence.
6.
STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASE RAISES UNUSUAL CLAIMS OR
DEFENSES
The parties state that this case does not raise unusual claims or defenses.
7.
OTHER MATTERS
This case is not an appeal from a decision issued on remand. The parties have no
other matters to bring to the attention of the Court.
8.
BRIEFING SCHEDULE
A.
Plaintiff's Opening Brief Due: September 3, 2013
B.
Defendant’s Response Brief Due: October 3, 2013
C.
Plaintiff’s Reply Brief (If Any) Due: October 18, 2013
-2-
9.
STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT
A.
B.
10.
Plaintiff's Statement: Plaintiff does not request oral argument.
Defendant's Statement: Defendant does not request oral argument.
CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE
A.
B.
11.
(
)
(X )
Indicate below the parties' consent choice.
All parties have consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a
United States Magistrate Judge.
All parties have not consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a
United States Magistrate Judge.
AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN
THE PARTIES FILING MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME OR CONTINUANCES MUST
COMPLY WITH D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(C) BY SUBMITTING PROOF THAT A COPY OF THE
MOTION HAS BEEN SERVED UPON THE MOVING ATTORNEY'S CLIENT, ALL ATTORNEYS
OF RECORD, AND ALL PRO SE PARTIES.
The parties agree that the Joint Case Management Plan may be altered or amended only
upon a showing of good cause.
DATED this 23rd day of July, 2013.
BY THE COURT:
s/John L. Kane
U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
-3-
APPROVED:
John F. Walsh
United States Attorney
s/ Rachael A. Lundy
402 W. 12th Street
Pueblo, CO 81003
719-473-1515
719-543-8403 (facsimile)
seckarlaw@mindspring.com
By: s/ Stephanie Lynn F. Kiley
Special Assistant U.S. Attorney
1961 Stout St., Suite 4169
Denver, CO 80294-4003
303-844-0815
303-844-0770 (facsimile)
stephanie.kiley@ssa.gov
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Attorneys for Defendant
-4-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?