Plumb v. Neil et al

Filing 29

MINUTE ORDER granting 27 Defendants Unopposed Motion to Amend Scheduling Order. Discovery due by 2/15/2014. Dispositive Motions due by 3/15/2014. Proposed Pretrial Order due by 5/23/2014. Final Pretrial Conference set for 5/30/2014 09:00 AM in Courtroom A 401 before Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 12/6/2013.(ervsl, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 13-cv-00890-WJM-BNB DONALD D. PLUMB, Plaintiff, v. THOMAS P. NEIL, and RED EAGLE OIL, INC., d/b/a Red Eagle Transportation, Defendants. ______________________________________________________________________________ MINUTE ORDER ______________________________________________________________________________ Minute Order Entered by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland This matter is before the Court on the Defendants’ Unopposed Motion to Amend Scheduling Order [docket no. 27, filed December 6, 2013] (the “Motion”). IT IS ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED and the Scheduling Order is amended as follows: The parties shall designate all rebuttal experts and provide opposing counsel with all information specified in Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2) on or before January 15, 2014; Discovery Cut-off: Dispositive Motion Deadline: February 15, 2014; March 15, 2014. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Pretrial Conference set for March 27, 2014, is vacated and reset to May 30, 2014, at 9:00 a.m., in Courtroom A-401, Fourth Floor, Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse, 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado 80294. The proposed Pretrial Order, submitted pursuant to District of Colorado ECF Procedures V.5.1, is due on or before May 23, 2014. Please remember that anyone seeking entry into the Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse will be required to show a valid photo identification. See D.C.COLO.LCivR 83.2B. DATED: December 6, 2013

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?