Howard v. Colvin

Filing 13

JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES (ORDER). SS Plaintiffs Brief due by 10/22/2013. SS Defendants Brief due by 11/21/2013. SS Plaintiffs Reply Brief due by 12/6/2013. By Judge John L. Kane on 8/29/13. (mnfsl, )

IN THEUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
CivilActionNo.13-cv-0944-AP

JAMES A. HOWARD,
Plaintiff,
v.
Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.

JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIALSECURITYCASES

1. APPEARANCES OF COUNSELANDPROSE PARTIES
For Plaintiff:
Charles E. Binder
Law Offices of Harry J. Binder & Charles E.
Binder, P.C.
60 East 42 Street, Suite 520New York,
New York New York 10165
212-677-6801
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
For Defendant:
Stephanie Lynn F. Kiley
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Office of the General Counsel
Social Security Administration
1961 Stout Street, Suite 4169
Denver, Colorado 80294-4003
[phone]
[e-mail]

John F. Walsh
United States Attorney
J.B. García
Assistant United States Attorney
District of Colorado

-1-

2. STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASISFOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION
TheCourthasjurisdictionbasedonsection205(g)oftheSocialSecurityAct,42
U.S.C.405(g).
3. DATES OF FILINGOF RELEVANT PLEADINGS
A.
B.

Date ComplaintWasServed on U.S.Attorney'sOffice: June 10, 2013

C.
4.

Date Complaint WasFiled: April 12, 2013

Date Answer and Administrative Record Were Filed: August 9, 2013

STATEMENT REGARDING THEADEQUACYOF THE RECORD

The parties, to the best of their knowledge, state that the administrative record is complete and
accurate.
5.

STATEMENT REGARDINGADDITIONAL EVIDENCE

Neither party intends to submit additional evidence.
6.

STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASE RAISES UNUSUAL CLAIMS OR
DEFENSES

The parties, to the best of their knowledge, do not believe the case raises unusual claims or
defenses.
7.

OTHER MATTERS

The parties have no other matters to bring to the attention of the Court.
The parties state that this case is not on appeal from a decision issued on remand from this Court.
8.

BRIEFING SCHEDULE

Due to Defendant’s counsel’s caseload, the parties request a briefing schedule two weeks outside
of the standard time frame.
A.

Plaintiff's Opening Brief Due:October 22, 2013

B.

Defendant’s Response Brief Due: November 21, 2013

C.

Plaintiff’s ReplyBrief (IfAny)Due:December 6, 2013

-2-

9.

STATEMENTSREGARDINGORALARGUMENT
A.

Plaintiff's Statement:Plaintiff does not request oral argument.

B.

Defendant's Statement:Defendant does not request oral argument.

10. CONSENT TO EXERCISE OFJURISDICTION BYMAGISTRATE JUDGE
Indicate belowtheparties'consentchoice.
A.

(x) All partieshave consented to theexerciseof jurisdiction of a
United StatesMagistrate Judge.

B.

() Allpartieshavenot consented to theexerciseof jurisdiction ofa
United StatesMagistrate Judge.

11. AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN
THE PARTIESFILINGMOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OFTIMEORCONTINUANCES
MUSTCOMPLYWITHD.C.COLO.LCivR7.1(C)BYSUBMITTINGPROOF THAT A COPYOF THE
MOTION HAS BEEN SERVED UPON THEMOVING ATTORNEY'SCLIENT,ALLATTORNEYS OF
RECORD, ANDALL PROSEPARTIES.
Thepartiesagreethat the Joint CaseManagementPlan maybealtered or amended onlyupona
showing ofgood cause.
DATED this 29th day of August, 2013.
BYTHE COURT:
s/John L. Kane

U.S.DISTRICTCOURTJUDGE

APPROVED:

UNITED STATESATTORNEY

/s/ Charles E. Binder

/s/ Stephanie Lynn F. Kiley

Charles E. Binder
Law Offices of Harry J. Binder
& Charles E. Binder, P.C
60 East 42 Street, Suite 520
New York, New York 10165
212-677-6901
[e-mail]

By: Stephanie Lynn F. Kiley
Special Assistant U.S. Attorney
1961 Stout Street, Suite 4169
Denver, CO 80294-4003
303-844-0815
[e-mail]

-3-