Thurston v. Stringari, et al
Filing
29
ORDER For Service by United States Marshal. By Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 10/02/13. (alvsl)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland
Civil Action No. 13-cv-01038-RBJ-BNB
DONALD S. THURSTON,
Plaintiff,
v.
SGT. STRINGARI, C.D.O.C. Officer,
CPT. RODNEY ACHEN, C.D.O.C. Officer,
CHARLES J. SCHOEPHOERSTER, PA, Clinical Services,
R. WOODCOCK, RN, Clinical Services,
E. WHITTAKER, RN, Clinical Services,
ROY HAVEN, Provider, Clinical Services, and
UNKNOWN CLINICAL SERVICES STAFF in Colorado Territorial Correctional Facility,
Defendants.
______________________________________________________________________________
ORDER FOR SERVICE BY UNITED STATES MARSHAL
______________________________________________________________________________
The defendants have filed with the court under Restricted Level 3 the last known address
of defendant Schoephoerster [Doc. #28]. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED:
(1) The United States Marshal shall effect service of the Summons and Second
Amended Complaint [Doc. #8] on defendant Schoephoerster at the address provided by the
defendants in Document #28;
(2) Access to the address contained in Document #28 shall remain under Restricted
Level 3 pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.2 pending further order of the court;
(3) Any return of service filed concerning defendant Schoephoerster shall be filed under
Restricted Level 3 pending further order of the court;
(4) The Clerk of the Court is directed to file without restriction and open to public
inspection a copy of the return of service which redacts the address where service was made or
attempted;
(5)
Defendant Schoephoerster or counsel for the defendant shall respond to the Second
Amended Complaint as provided for in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure after service of
process.
Dated October 2, 2013.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Boyd N. Boland
United States Magistrate Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?