Thurston v. Stringari, et al

Filing 29

ORDER For Service by United States Marshal. By Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 10/02/13. (alvsl)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland Civil Action No. 13-cv-01038-RBJ-BNB DONALD S. THURSTON, Plaintiff, v. SGT. STRINGARI, C.D.O.C. Officer, CPT. RODNEY ACHEN, C.D.O.C. Officer, CHARLES J. SCHOEPHOERSTER, PA, Clinical Services, R. WOODCOCK, RN, Clinical Services, E. WHITTAKER, RN, Clinical Services, ROY HAVEN, Provider, Clinical Services, and UNKNOWN CLINICAL SERVICES STAFF in Colorado Territorial Correctional Facility, Defendants. ______________________________________________________________________________ ORDER FOR SERVICE BY UNITED STATES MARSHAL ______________________________________________________________________________ The defendants have filed with the court under Restricted Level 3 the last known address of defendant Schoephoerster [Doc. #28]. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: (1) The United States Marshal shall effect service of the Summons and Second Amended Complaint [Doc. #8] on defendant Schoephoerster at the address provided by the defendants in Document #28; (2) Access to the address contained in Document #28 shall remain under Restricted Level 3 pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.2 pending further order of the court; (3) Any return of service filed concerning defendant Schoephoerster shall be filed under Restricted Level 3 pending further order of the court; (4) The Clerk of the Court is directed to file without restriction and open to public inspection a copy of the return of service which redacts the address where service was made or attempted; (5) Defendant Schoephoerster or counsel for the defendant shall respond to the Second Amended Complaint as provided for in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure after service of process. Dated October 2, 2013. BY THE COURT: s/ Boyd N. Boland United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?