Briggs v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation et al

Filing 14

ORDER granting 13 Motion to Dismiss. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 5/20/2013. (klyon, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Robert E. Blackburn Civil Action No. 13-cv-01060-REB-MJS CAROL F. BRIGGS, Plaintiff, v. FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION, as Trustee, WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC., and DOES 1-10 inclusive, Defendants. ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS Blackburn, J. This matter is before me on the Pro Se Plaintiff’s Motion To Withdraw Complaint [#13]1 filed May 16, 2013. The plaintiff filed her motion before any of the defendants served either an answer or motion for summary judgment. Under FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a)(1)(A), a plaintiff is entitled to dismiss her complaint without the consent of the court or the defendants if the notice of dismissal is filed before any of the defendants serve either an answer or motion for summary judgment. Thus, the plaintiff is entitled to dismiss her complaint under Rule 41(a)(1)(A). THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows: 1. That the Pro Se Plaintiff’s Motion To Withdraw Complaint [#13] filed May 1 “[#13]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific paper by the court’s case management and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). I use this convention throughout this order. 16, 2013, is GRANTED; 2. That under FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a), this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. Dated May 20, 2013, at Denver, Colorado. BY THE COURT: 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?