Small v. Young, et al
Filing
37
JUDGMENT by Clerk in favor of Daniel Thompson, Jeff Huddleston, Marc Chacon, Melissa Young against Tyron Duante Small re: 36 Order, by Clerk on 10/31/2013. (klyon, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 13-cv-01075-REB-CBS
TYRON DUANTE SMALL,
Plaintiff,
v.
DISTRICT ATTORNEY MELISSA YOUNG,
DETECTIVE JEFF HUDDLESTON,
DETECTIVE MARC CHACON, and
OFFICER DANIEL THOMPSON,
Defendants.
FINAL JUDGMENT
This Final Judgment is entered pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a) and in
accordance with the Order Adopting Recommendation of the United States
Magistrate Judge [#36] entered by Judge Robert E. Blackburn on October 31, 2013,
which order is incorporated herein by this reference.
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:
1. That the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge [#35], filed
October 10, 2013, is APPROVED AND ADOPTED as an order of this court;
2. That Defendants’ Motion To Dismiss (Pro Se Prisoner) Amended
Complaint [#25], filed July 2, 2013, is GRANTED;
3. That Defendant Young’s Motion To Dismiss Amended Complaint and Jury
Demand (Doc. No. 9) Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) and (6) [#26], filed July 2,
2013, is GRANTED;
4. That plaintiff’s claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as barred by
limitations;
5. That judgment with prejudice SHALL ENTER on behalf of defendants, District
Attorney Melissa Young; Detective Jeff Huddleston; Detective Marc Chacon; and Officer
Daniel Thompson, against plaintiff, Tyron Duante Small, as to all claims and causes of
action asserted against them herein; and
6. That the defendants are AWARDED their costs to be taxed by the Clerk of the
Court pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(d)(1) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 54.1.
DATED at Denver, Colorado, this 31st day of October, 2013.
FOR THE COURT:
Jeffrey P. Colwell, Clerk
By: s/Kathleen Finney
Kathleen Finney
Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?