Voltage Pictures, LLC v. Does 1-22
Filing
21
MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice the following motions: 17 Defendant Doe No. 15's Motion to Quash Subpoena, 18 Doe No. 15's Motion to Sever, and 19 Doe No. 15's Motion to Proceed Anonymously. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 7/15/2013. (mehcd)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 13-cv-01121-WYD-MEH
VOLTAGE PICTURES, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company,
Plaintiff,
v.
DOES 1-22,
Defendants.
MINUTE ORDER
Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on July 15, 2013.
Pending before the Court are Defendant Doe No. 15's Motion to Quash Subpoena [filed July
12, 2013; docket #17], Doe No. 15's Motion to Sever [filed July 12, 2013; docket #18] and Doe No.
15's Motion to Proceed Anonymously [filed July 12, 2013; docket #19]. The Motions are denied
without prejudice for failure to comply with D.C. Colo. LCivR 7.1A.
The Court reminds the parties that it “will not consider any motion, other than a motion
under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 or 56, unless counsel for the moving party or a pro se party, before filing
the motion, has conferred or made reasonable, good-faith efforts to confer with opposing counsel.
” D.C. Colo. LCivR 7.1A (emphasis added). It is the responsibility of the moving party to “state
in the motion, or in a certificate attached to the motion, the specific efforts to comply with this
rule...” Id. The pending Motions contain no such certificate, nor any other indication that Doe 15
attempted to obtain Plaintiff’s position on the Motions before seeking relief from the Court.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?