Adema Technologies, Inc v. Eiffert et al

Filing 96

MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice 91 Motion to Amend/Correct/Modify. By Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 04/23/2015. (athom, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-01139-CMA-NYW
ADEMA TECHNOLOGIES, INC., d/b/a
GLORIA SOLAR (USA),
Plaintiff,
v.
PATRINA EIFFERT, and
IMAGINIT, INC.,
Defendants.
MINUTE ORDER
Entered by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang
This civil action comes before the court on Plaintiff Adema Technologies, Inc.
(“Plaintiff”) Motion to Amend Witness and Trial Exhibit List [#91], filed April 20, 2015
(“Motion”). Pursuant to the Order of Reference [#4] dated May 3, 2013, and the Memorandum
[#94] dated April 21, 2015, the Motion is before this Magistrate Judge.
IT IS ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Under
D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(a), counsel for the moving party is (absent certain circumstances) required
to confer with opposing counsel (or the opposing party, if unrepresented) to resolve any contested
issue if possible in advance of filing any request for relief from the court. Under that Local Rule,
a certificate of conferral is also required. The court instructs Plaintiff’s counsel to meet-andconfer with opposing counsel for the Defendants in advance of any re-filing, and to include an
appropriate certification to accompany any subsequent moving papers relating to potentially
disputed matters.
DATED April 23, 2015.