Artino v. Adams County et al

Filing 49

MINUTE ORDER granting 47 Motion to Compel. On or before April 3, 2014, plaintiff shall provide a supplemental response to defendant Charity Ruth Grimsley Hinkley's interrogatory. Defendant Charity Ruth Grimsley Hinkleys request for fees and sanctions are DENIED by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 03/24/14.(jhawk, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 13-cv-01155-PAB-MJW
BENEDETTO ARTINO,
Plaintiff,
v.
ADAMS COUNTY,
ADAMS COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE,
ERIK BORN,
DOUGLAS N. DARR, and
CHARITY RUTH GRIMSLEY HINKLEY,
Defendants.
MINUTE ORDER
Entered by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe
It is hereby ORDERED that defendant Charity Ruth Grimsley Hinkley’s Motion to
Compel Discovery and Disclosure of Computation of Damages Pursuant to 26(a)(1), 33
and 37 (Docket No. 47) is GRANTED. The court notes that plaintiff did not file a timely
response to the subject motion. An argument to which no response is offered may be
deemed confessed. See Alvariza v. Home Depot, 05-cv-02590-EWN-BNB, 2007 WL
794187, at *8 (Mar. 14, 2007 D. Colo.). Regardless, the court finds good cause for the
relief sought in the subject motion.
Accordingly, on or before April 3, 2014, plaintiff shall provide a supplemental
response to defendant Charity Ruth Grimsley Hinkley’s interrogatory. Plaintiff’s
response must specify the categories of damages sought, and a computation of each
category of economic damages claimed by plaintiff.
Defendant Charity Ruth Grimsley Hinkley’s request for fees and sanctions are
DENIED. However, if plaintiff’s supplemental response is inadequate and/or untimely,
the court may award fees and/or sanction plaintiff.
Date: March 24, 2014