Purzel Video GmbH v. Does 3, 8, 10, 11, 12, 17, 21, 24, 25, 30, 33, 35, 37, 40, 41, 44, 47, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 62 and 63

Filing 20

ORDER. ORDERED that plaintiff, Purzel Video GmbH, shall amend the case caption on future filings to reflect the dismissal of Doe Nos. 11, 33, and 35 by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 07/17/13. (jjhsl, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Senior Judge Wiley Y. Daniel
Civil Action No. 13-cv-01166-WYD-MEH
PURZEL VIDEO GmbH,
Plaintiff,
v.
DOES 3, 8, 10, 11, 17, 21, 25, 30, 33, 35, 37, 40, 44, 47, 54-60, 62, and 63,
Defendants.

ORDER

THIS MATTER is before the Court on plaintiff, Purzel Video GmbH’s, Dismissal
Of Doe Nos. 11, 33, And 35 Pursuant To Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i) [ECF No. 19].
After careful review of the file, the Court concludes that pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i)
of the FEDERAL RULES of CIVIL PROCEDURE, Doe Nos. 11 and 35 should be dismissed
without prejudice from this action and Doe No. 33 should be dismissed with prejudice
from this action. Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that defendants, Doe Nos. 11 and 35, are DISMISSED WITHOUT
PREJUDICE from this action. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that defendant, Doe No. 33, is DISMISSED WITH
PREJUDICE from this action. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff, Purzel Video GmbH, shall amend the case
caption on future filings to reflect the dismissal of Doe Nos. 11, 33, and 35.

Dated: July 17, 2013.

BY THE COURT:
/s/ Wiley Y. Daniel
Wiley Y. Daniel
Senior U.S. District Judge

-2-