Purzel Video GmbH v. Does 64, 69, 74, 76, 77, 79, 81, 85, 87, 92, 93, 94, 95, 97, 98, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 112, 113 and 114

Filing 17

ORDER. ORDERED that defendant, Doe No. 103, is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE from this action. ORDERED that plaintiff, Purzel Video GmbH, shall amend the case caption on future filings to reflect the dismissal of Doe No. 103 by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 07/17/13. (jjhsl, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Senior Judge Wiley Y. Daniel
Civil Action No. 13-cv-01167-WYD-MEH
PURZEL VIDEO GmbH,
Plaintiff,
v.
DOES 64, 69, 74, 76, 77, 79, 81, 85, 87, 92-95, 97, 98, 101-107, and 112-114,
Defendants.

ORDER

THIS MATTER is before the Court on plaintiff, Purzel Video GmbH’s, Dismissal
Of Doe No. 103 Pursuant To Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i) [ECF No. 16], filed on July
16, 2013. After careful review of the file, the Court concludes that pursuant to Rule
41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the FEDERAL RULES of CIVIL PROCEDURE, defendant, Doe No. 103,
should be dismissed without prejudice from this action. Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that defendant, Doe No. 103, is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE
from this action. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff, Purzel Video GmbH, shall amend the case
caption on future filings to reflect the dismissal of Doe No. 103.
Dated: July 17, 2013.

BY THE COURT:
/s/ Wiley Y. Daniel
Wiley Y. Daniel
Senior U.S. District Judge