Purzel Video GmbH v. Does 64, 69, 74, 76, 77, 79, 81, 85, 87, 92, 93, 94, 95, 97, 98, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 112, 113 and 114

Filing 59

ORDER re: 58 Stipulation filed by Purzel Video GmbH, Geoff Inge is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE from this action, with each party to pay its own attorney fees and costs, by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 1/28/2014. (evana, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 13-cv-01167-WYD-MEH PURZEL VIDEO GmbH, Plaintiff, v. REGINALD KEY, BENITO SMOAK, GEOFF INGE, and DON SYSLAN, Defendants. ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF PARTY WITH PREJUDICE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the parties’ Stipulation of Dismissal Between Purzel Video GmbH and Geoff Inge (ECF No. 58) with prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a). After carefully reviewing the file in this matter, I find that the stipulation should be approved pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a) and Defendant Inge should be dismissed with prejudice. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Stipulation of Dismissal Between Purzel Video GmbH and Geoff Inge (ECF No. 58) is APPROVED. Defendant Inge is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE from this action, with each party to pay its own attorney fees and costs. Dated: January 28, 2014 BY THE COURT: s/ Wiley Y. Daniel WILEY Y. DANIEL, UNITED STATES SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?