Purzel Video GmbH v. Does 64, 69, 74, 76, 77, 79, 81, 85, 87, 92, 93, 94, 95, 97, 98, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 112, 113 and 114

Filing 63

MINUTE ORDER granting in part and denying in part 60 Plaintiffs Combined Motion to Compel Discovery against Benito Smoak, to Modify the Discovery Schedule, and for Attorneys Fees, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 5/5/2014.(evana, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 13-cv-001167-WYD-MEH
PURZEL VIDEO GmbH,
Plaintiff,
v.
BENITO SMOAK,
Defendant.

MINUTE ORDER
Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on May 5, 2014.
Having no objection nor opposition from the Defendant and in the interest of judicial
efficiency, Plaintiff’s Combined Motion to Compel Discovery against Benito Smoak, to Modify the
Discovery Schedule, and for Attorney’s Fees [filed March 25, 2014; docket # 60] is granted in part,
denied in part, and denied without prejudice in part as follows:
(1)

Plaintiff’s request for an order compelling Defendant to produce initial disclosures is
granted, and Defendant shall submit his initial disclosures to Plaintiff on or before May
19, 2014;

(2)

Plaintiff’s request for an order compelling Defendant to respond to its first set of discovery
is denied without prejudice for Defendant’s failure to attach a copy of its discovery
requests in accordance with D.C. Colo. LCivR 37.1;

(3)

The Court will impose a temporary stay on the discovery deadlines set forth in the
operative Scheduling Order pending the outcome of its Order to Show Cause filed
contemporaneously with this minute order; and

(4)

The Court denies Plaintiff’s request for an award of reasonable expenses pursuant to Fed.
R. Civ. P. 37(a)(5).