Purzel Video GmbH v. Does 115, 116, 117, 119, 121, 123, 124, 125, 127, 128, 129, 130, 133, 137, 139, 140, 144, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 153, 154 and 155
Filing
19
ORDER. ORDERED that Defendant Doe Nos. 115, 121, 127, 139, 147, and 154 are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Doe Nos. 119, 124, 125, 148, and 150 are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 08/06/13. (jjhsl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Senior Judge Wiley Y. Daniel
Civil Action No. 13-cv-01171-WYD-MEH
PURZEL VIDEO GmbH,
Plaintiff,
v.
DOES 116, 117, 123, 128, 130, 133, 137, 140, 144, 149, 151, 153, and 155,
Defendants.
ORDER
In accordance with the Notice of Dismissal of Doe No. 115, 119, 121, 124, 125,
127, 139, 147, 148, 150, and 154 Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i) filed on
August 2, 2013 (ECF No. 18), it is
ORDERED that Defendant Doe Nos. 115, 121, 127, 139, 147, and 154 are
DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Doe Nos. 119, 124, 125, 148, and 150 are
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. These Does shall hereafter be taken off the caption.
Dated: August 6, 2013
BY THE COURT:
s/ Wiley Y. Daniel
Wiley Y. Daniel
Senior United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?