Purzel Video GmbH v. Does 65, 66, 67, 70, 72, 73, 75, 78, 83, 84, 89, 90, 91, 100, 109, 110, 118, 122, 126, 131, 132, 134, 141, 142 and 145
Filing
29
ORDER. ORDERED that Doe Nos. 90 and 131 are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, and shall hereafter be taken off the caption by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 07/01/13. (jjhsl, )
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Senior Judge Wiley Y. Daniel
Civil Action No. 13-cv-01172-WYD-MEH
PURZEL VIDEO GmbH,
Plaintiff,
v.
DOES 65, 66, 67, 70, 72, 73, 75, 78, 83, 84, 89, 90, 91, 100, 109, 110, 118, 122, 126,
131, 132, 134, 141, 142 and 145,
Defendants.
ORDER
In accordance with the Dismissal of Doe Nos. 90 and 131 Pursuant to Fed. R.
Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i) (ECF No. 28), it is
ORDERED that Doe Nos. 90 and 131 are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE,
and shall hereafter be taken off the caption.
Dated: July 1, 2013
BY THE COURT:
s/ Wiley Y. Daniel
Wiley Y. Daniel
Senior United States District Judge
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
