Purzel Video GmbH v. Does 65, 66, 67, 70, 72, 73, 75, 78, 83, 84, 89, 90, 91, 100, 109, 110, 118, 122, 126, 131, 132, 134, 141, 142 and 145

Filing 32

ORDER. ORDERED that Doe No. 84 is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, and Doe Nos. 67, 132, 141, and 142 are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. These Defendants shall hereafter be taken off the caption by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 07/18/13. (jjhsl, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Senior Judge Wiley Y. Daniel
Civil Action No. 13-cv-01172-WYD-MEH
PURZEL VIDEO GmbH,
Plaintiff,
v.
DOES 65, 66, 67, 70, 72, 73, 75, 78, 83, 84, 89, 91, 100, 109, 110, 118, 122, 126, 132,
134, 141, 142 and 145,
Defendants.

ORDER

In accordance with the Notice of Dismissal of Doe Nos. 67, 84, 132, 141, and
142 Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i) (ECF No. 31), it is
ORDERED that Doe No. 84 is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, and Doe
Nos. 67, 132, 141, and 142 are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. These Defendants
shall hereafter be taken off the caption.
Dated: July 18, 2013
BY THE COURT:
s/ Wiley Y. Daniel
Wiley Y. Daniel
Senior United States District Judge