Purzel Video GmbH v. Does 65, 66, 67, 70, 72, 73, 75, 78, 83, 84, 89, 90, 91, 100, 109, 110, 118, 122, 126, 131, 132, 134, 141, 142 and 145

Filing 34

ORDER. ORDERED that Doe No. 110 is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, and Doe No. 122 is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 08/06/13. (jjhsl, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Senior Judge Wiley Y. Daniel
Civil Action No. 13-cv-01172-WYD-MEH
PURZEL VIDEO GmbH,
Plaintiff,
v.
DOES 65, 66, 70, 72, 73, 75, 78, 83, 89, 91, 100, 109, 110, 118, 122, 126, 134, and
145,
Defendants.

ORDER

In accordance with the Notice of Dismissal of Doe Nos. 110 and 122 Pursuant to
Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i) (ECF No. 33), it is
ORDERED that Doe No. 110 is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, and Doe
No. 122 is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. These Defendants shall hereafter be taken
off the caption.
Dated: August 6, 2013
BY THE COURT:
s/ Wiley Y. Daniel
Wiley Y. Daniel
Senior United States District Judge