Purzel Video GmbH v. Does 65, 66, 67, 70, 72, 73, 75, 78, 83, 84, 89, 90, 91, 100, 109, 110, 118, 122, 126, 131, 132, 134, 141, 142 and 145
Filing
38
ORDER. ORDERED that Plaintiff's Dismissal of Does Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(A)(1)(A)(i) filed on August 14, 2013 (ECF No. 36) is MOOT by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 08/14/13. (jjhsl, )
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Senior Judge Wiley Y. Daniel
Civil Action No. 13-cv-01172-WYD-MEH
PURZEL VIDEO GmbH,
Plaintiff,
v.
DONALD BIBY,
BILL YATES,
and JESUS SANCHEZ,
Defendants.
ORDER
In light of the filing of the Amended Complaint with three named Defendants
(ECF No. 37), it is
ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Dismissal of Does Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.
41(A)(1)(A)(i) filed on August 14, 2013 (ECF No. 36) is MOOT.
Dated: August 14, 2013
BY THE COURT:
s/ Wiley Y. Daniel
Wiley Y. Daniel
Senior United States District Judge
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
