Bryan v. Hickenlooper et al

Filing 27

ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that: 1. The court's Order dated September 20, 2013 (Doc. # 26 ) is WITHDRAWN. 2. Mr. Bryan's "Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to: Order to Dismiss in Part and Draw Case" (filed September 18, 2013) (Doc. # 22 ) is DENIED as unnecessary. By Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 09/24/13. (alvsl)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 13-cv-01192-RBJ-CBS
DAVID GUY BRYAN,
Plaintiff,
v.
DAVE TESSIER,
Defendant.
____________________________________________________________________________
ORDER
____________________________________________________________________________
Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer
This civil action came before the court on Mr. Bryan’s “Motion for Extension of Time to
Respond to: Order to Dismiss in Part and Draw Case” (filed September 18, 2013) (Doc. # 22).
Pursuant to the Order of Reference to United States Magistrate Judge dated September 12, 2013
(Doc. # 18) and the memorandum dated September 19, 2013 (Doc. # 25), this matter was referred
to the Magistrate Judge. The court having reviewed the entire case file and being sufficiently
advised in the premises, IT IS ORDERED that:
1.

The court’s Order dated September 20, 2013 (Doc. # 26) is WITHDRAWN.

2.

Mr. Bryan’s “Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to: Order to Dismiss in Part and

Draw Case” (filed September 18, 2013) (Doc. # 22) is DENIED as unnecessary. Senior Judge
Babcock's Order to Dismiss in Part and to Draw Case to a District Judge and to a Magistrate Judge
(Doc. # 15) is not amenable to a response. Nor is the Order immediately appealable as a final order
that ended the action, because it did not adjudicate all of the claims and liabilities against all the
parties in the case. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 54.
DATED at Denver, Colorado, this 24th day of September, 2013.
BY THE COURT:

s/Craig B. Shaffer
United States Magistrate Judge

1