Phillips 66 Company v. Spring Valley Gas, Inc. et al

Filing 21

ORDER DISMISSING CASE This matter comes before the Court on the Parties Stipulated Settlement Agreement and Order of Dismissal, filed February 12, 2014 ECF No. 20 . The Court having reviewed the Stipulation and being fully advised hereby ORDERS a s follows: The Parties Stipulated Settlement Agreement is ACCEPTED. The above captioned matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Each party shall pay his, her or its own attorneys fees and costs. In the event that the Settlement is not perfected, any party may move to reopen the case and the trial will be rescheduled, provided that such motion is filed within 35 days of this Order, by Judge William J. Martinez on 2/12/2014. (evana, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge William J. Martínez Civil Case No. 13-cv-1222-WJM-KLM PHILLIPS 66 COMPANY Plaintiff, v. SPRING VALLEY GAS, INC., GARY L. HUGGINS, and JUDY O. HUGGINS Defendants. ORDER OF DISMISSAL This matter comes before the Court on the Parties’ Stipulated Settlement Agreement and Order of Dismissal, filed February 12, 2014 (ECF No. 20). The Court having reviewed the Stipulation and being fully advised hereby ORDERS as follows: The Parties’ Stipulated Settlement Agreement is ACCEPTED. The abovecaptioned matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Each party shall pay his, her or its own attorney’s fees and costs. In the event that the Settlement is not perfected, any party may move to reopen the case and the trial will be rescheduled, provided that such motion is filed within 35 days of this Order. Dated this 12th day of February, 2013. BY THE COURT: _______________________ William J. Martínez United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?