Shaw v. Interthinx, Inc. et al

Filing 202

ORDER: This case continues to be STAYED pending further order of the court. By May 16, 2014, the parties SHALL FILE a joint status report apprising the court of the status of the case. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 4/23/2014. (klyon, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Robert E. Blackburn Civil Action No. 13-cv-01229-REB-BNB CELESTE SHAW, and JUDITH VERHEECKE, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. INTERTHINX, INC., a California corporation, VERISK ANALYTICS, INC., a Delaware corporation, and JEFFREY MOYER, an individual, Defendants. ORDER Blackburn, J. This matter is before me sua sponte. As required by my previous Order [#199],1 filed February 24, 2014, the parties were required to file on April 22, 2014, a joint status report on the progress of their mediation. The parties have complied with that directive, and now advise that although settlement was not reached at the mediation on April 17, 2014, the mediator proposed settlement. (See Joint Status Report ¶ 4 at 2 [#200], filed April 22, 2014.) The parties have been given a deadline of April 28, 2014, to accept or reject the mediator’s proposal, and, thus, request a brief continuance of the stay in order to evaluate the proposal. 1 “[#199]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific paper by the court’s case management and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). I use this convention throughout this order. Having reviewed the motion and being adequately advised, the I find and conclude that the motion is well-taken and should be granted. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows: 1. That this case continues to be STAYED pending further order of the court; and 2. That by May 16, 2014, the parties SHALL FILE a joint status report apprising the court of the status of the case. Dated April 23, 2014, at Denver, Colorado. BY THE COURT: 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?