Medina v. Catholic Health Initiatives et al
Filing
113
MINUTE ORDER granting 111 Unopposed Motion to Set Deadline for Defendants' Responses to Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint. Defendants shall respond to Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint [# 82 ] on or before 12/23/2013. By Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 12/3/2013.(klyon, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 13-cv-01249-REB-KLM
JANEEN MEDINA,
RHETT J. DUDLEY, and
ARIC B. FOWLER, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, and on behalf
of CHI Plans,
Plaintiffs,
v.
CATHOLIC HEALTH INITIATIVES, a Colorado Corporation,
GERALDINE BEDNASH,
MAUREEN COMER,
RICHARD CORRENTE,
DAVID R. EDWARDS,
KATHERINE GRAY,
BARBARA HAGEDORN,
JAMES HAMILL,
ANTOINETTE HARDY-WALLER,
PHYLLIS HUGHES,
DONALD JONES,
ANDREA J. LEE,
DAVID R. LINCOLN,
KEVIN E. LOFTON,
CHRISTOPHER R. LOWNEY,
ELEANOR F. MARTIN,
MARY MARGARET MOONEY,
LILLIAN MURPHY,
MARY JO POTTER,
PATRICIA SMITH,
EDWARD SPEED,
DEAN SWINDLE,
PATRICIA G. WEBB, and
JOHN AND JANE DOES, 1-10, whose true name are unknown,
Defendants.
_____________________________________________________________________
MINUTE ORDER
_____________________________________________________________________
ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX
1
This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Unopposed Motion to Set Deadline
for Defendants’ Responses to Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint [#111]1 (the “Motion”).
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion [#111] is GRANTED. Accordingly,
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants shall respond to Plaintiffs’ Amended
Complaint [#82] on or before December 23, 2013.
Dated: December 3, 2013
1
“[#111]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to
a specific paper by the Court’s case management and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). I
use this convention throughout this Minute Order.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?