Medina v. Catholic Health Initiatives et al

Filing 132

ORDER of Dismissal as to Defendant Carol Keenan, Only. The Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal of Defendant Carol Keenan [# 119 ] is APPROVED. Plaintiffs' claims against defendant, Carol Keenan, are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Defendant, Carol Keenan, is DROPPED as a named party to this action, and the case caption is amended accordingly. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 12/31/2013. (klyon, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Robert E. Blackburn
Civil Action No. 13-cv-01249-REB-KLM
JANEEN MEDINA,
RHETT J. DUDLEY, AND
ARIC B. FOWLER, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, and on
behalf of the CHI Plans,
Plaintiffs,
v.
CATHOLIC HEALTH INITIATIVES, a Colorado corporation,
GERALDINE BEDNASH,
MAUREEN COMER,
RICHARD CORRENTE,
DAVID R. EDWARDS,
KATHERINE GRAY,
BARBARA HAGEDORN,
JAMES HAMILL,
ANTOINETTE HARDY-WALLER,
PHYLLIS HUGHES,
DONALD JONES,
ANDREA J. LEE,
DAVID R. LINCOLN,
KEVIN E. LOFTON,
CHRISTOPHER R. LOWNEY,
ELEANOR F. MARTIN,
MARY MARGARET MOONEY,
LILLIAN MURPHY,
MARY JO POTTER,
PARTICIA SMITH,
EDWARD SPEED,
DEAN SWINDLE,
PATRICIA G. WEBB, and
JOHN and JANE DOES, 1-10, whose true names are unknown,
Defendant.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL AS TO DEFENDANT CAROL KEENAN, ONLY
Blackburn, J.

The matter is before me on the Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal of
Defendant Carol Keenan [#119]1 filed December 23, 2013. After reviewing the
stipulation and the record, I conclude that the stipulation should be approved and that
plaintiffs’ claims against defendant, Carol Keenan, should be dismissed without
prejudice.
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:
1. That the Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal of Defendant Carol Keenan
[#119] filed December 23, 2013, is APPROVED;
2. That plaintiffs’ claims against defendant, Carol Keenan, are DISMISSED
WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and
3. That defendant, Carol Keenan, is DROPPED as a named party to this action,
and the case caption is amended accordingly.
Dated December 31, 2013, at Denver, Colorado.
BY THE COURT:

1

“[#119]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a
specific paper by the court’s electronic case filing and management system (CM/ECF). I use this
convention throughout this order.

2