Medina v. Catholic Health Initiatives et al

Filing 132

ORDER of Dismissal as to Defendant Carol Keenan, Only. The Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal of Defendant Carol Keenan [# 119 ] is APPROVED. Plaintiffs' claims against defendant, Carol Keenan, are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Defendant, Carol Keenan, is DROPPED as a named party to this action, and the case caption is amended accordingly. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 12/31/2013. (klyon, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Robert E. Blackburn Civil Action No. 13-cv-01249-REB-KLM JANEEN MEDINA, RHETT J. DUDLEY, AND ARIC B. FOWLER, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, and on behalf of the CHI Plans, Plaintiffs, v. CATHOLIC HEALTH INITIATIVES, a Colorado corporation, GERALDINE BEDNASH, MAUREEN COMER, RICHARD CORRENTE, DAVID R. EDWARDS, KATHERINE GRAY, BARBARA HAGEDORN, JAMES HAMILL, ANTOINETTE HARDY-WALLER, PHYLLIS HUGHES, DONALD JONES, ANDREA J. LEE, DAVID R. LINCOLN, KEVIN E. LOFTON, CHRISTOPHER R. LOWNEY, ELEANOR F. MARTIN, MARY MARGARET MOONEY, LILLIAN MURPHY, MARY JO POTTER, PARTICIA SMITH, EDWARD SPEED, DEAN SWINDLE, PATRICIA G. WEBB, and JOHN and JANE DOES, 1-10, whose true names are unknown, Defendant. ORDER OF DISMISSAL AS TO DEFENDANT CAROL KEENAN, ONLY Blackburn, J. The matter is before me on the Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal of Defendant Carol Keenan [#119]1 filed December 23, 2013. After reviewing the stipulation and the record, I conclude that the stipulation should be approved and that plaintiffs’ claims against defendant, Carol Keenan, should be dismissed without prejudice. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows: 1. That the Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal of Defendant Carol Keenan [#119] filed December 23, 2013, is APPROVED; 2. That plaintiffs’ claims against defendant, Carol Keenan, are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and 3. That defendant, Carol Keenan, is DROPPED as a named party to this action, and the case caption is amended accordingly. Dated December 31, 2013, at Denver, Colorado. BY THE COURT: 1 “[#119]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific paper by the court’s electronic case filing and management system (CM/ECF). I use this convention throughout this order. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?