Medina v. Catholic Health Initiatives et al

Filing 184

MINUTE ORDER granting 182 Defendants' Motion Requesting Oral Argument on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint. A Motion Hearing is SET for June 24, 2014 at 1:30 p.m. in Courtroom C-204 of the Byron G. Rogers U nited States Courthouse, 1929 Stout Street, Denver, Colorado. The purpose of the hearing is for the parties to offer argument regarding: (1) Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint with Memorandum in Support [# 123 ] and (2) Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [# 140 ]. By Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 5/14/2014. (klyon, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 13-cv-01249-REB-KLM
JANEEN MEDINA,
Plaintiff,
v.
CATHOLIC HEALTH INITIATIVES, a Colorado Corporation,
GERALDINE BEDNASH,
MAUREEN COMER,
RICHARD CORRENTE,
DAVID R. EDWARDS,
KATHERINE GRAY,
BARBARA HAGEDORN,
JAMES HAMILL,
ANTOINETTE HARDY-WALLER,
PHYLLIS HUGHES,
DONALD JONES,
ANDREA J. LEE,
DAVID R. LINCOLN,
KEVIN E. LOFTON,
CHRISTOPHER R. LOWNEY,
ELEANOR F. MARTIN,
MARY MARGARET MOONEY,
LILLIAN MURPHY,
MARY JO POTTER,
PATRICIA SMITH,
EDWARD SPEED,
DEAN SWINDLE,
PATRICIA G. WEBB, and
JOHN AND JANE DOES, 1-10, whose true names are unknown,
Defendants.
______________________________________________________________________
MINUTE ORDER
______________________________________________________________________
ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX
This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion Requesting Oral Argument
1

on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint [#182]1 (the
“Motion”) and a May 14, 2014 telephone conference with counsel for the parties.2
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion [#182] is GRANTED. Accordingly,
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a Motion Hearing is SET for June 24, 2014 at 1:30
p.m. in Courtroom C-204 of the Byron G. Rogers United States Courthouse, 1929 Stout
Street, Denver, Colorado. The purpose of the hearing is for the parties to offer argument
regarding: (1) Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint with
Memorandum in Support [#123] and (2) Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment
[#140]. Each side will have one hour to argue both motions and may allot their hour
between the two motions as they see fit.
Dated: May 14, 2014

1

“[#182]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to
a specific paper by the Court’s case management and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). I
use this convention throughout this Minute Order.
2

The Court may rule on a pending motion at any time. D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(d).

2