Doe et al v. McAfee et al

Filing 133

MINUTE ORDER: Plaintiffs' 130 Stipulated Motion to Seal Protected Documents is STRICKEN with directions to re-file. The motion will need to be re-filed, and the individual who files the document will need to file it as a "motion to restrict," so that it can be included in tomorrow's public posted report under D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.2(d). By Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 5/19/2015. (alowe)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 13-cv-01287-MSK-MJW
JOHN DOE,
JANE DOE,
E.C., by her parents and next friends,
E.S.C., by his parents and next friends, and
J.C., by his parents and next friends,
Plaintiffs,
v.
JOANNA MCAFEE,
LISA LITTLE,
JOEY HARRIS,
MITCHELL MIHALKO, and
CHAD HAYNES,
Defendants.
MINUTE ORDER
Entered by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe
It is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ Stipulated Motion to Seal Protected
Documents (Docket No. 130) is STRICKEN with directions to re-file.
Under D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.2(d), the Court may not act on a motion to restrict until
it has been publicly posted for three days. The publicly-posted reports are
automatically generated when a “motion to restrict” is filed through CM/ECF, and are
posted to the Court’s public website on a daily basis. Plaintiff’s motion, although
captioned correctly, was filed as a “motion to suppress” through CM/ECF. As a result, it
has not been publicly posted to the Court’s website.
The Court has checked with the Clerk of Court and the CM/ECF team and has
been informed that there is no way to add the mis-docketed motion to the daily report of
motions to restrict. The motion will need to be re-filed, and the individual who files the
document will need to file it as a “motion to restrict,” so that it can be included in
tomorrow’s publicly posted report under D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.2(d). Accordingly, the
motion is hereby STRICKEN, and Plaintiffs are directed to re-file it correctly.
Date: May 19, 2015