Allen v. Tucker et al
Filing
98
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 01/07/15 re: 96 Motion for Discovery. Although it has been titled and docketed as a Motion, Doc. 96, in actuality, consists of Requests for Production pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 34, Interrogatories pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 33, and Requests for Admission pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 36. Such discovery requests are directed to the Defendants and require no action on the part of the court. Text Only Entry(nmarb, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer
Civil Action No. 13-cv-01316-MSK-CBS
RODNEY B. ALLEN,
Plaintiff,
v.
M. TUCKER (Pueblo Unit Manager),
BATULIS (Pueblo Unit Counselor),
ROGERS (Registered Nurse),
Defendants.
ORDER
Magistrate Judge Shaffer
This matter comes before the court on Plaintiff’s “Motion for Discovery” (Doc. 96).
Pursuant to the Order Referring Case dated August 19, 2013 (Doc. 13) and the Memorandum
(Doc. 97) dated December 15, 2015, this matter was referred to the Magistrate Judge. The court
has reviewed the filing, the entire case file, and the applicable law and is sufficiently advised in
the premise.
Although it has been titled and docketed as a Motion, Doc. 96, in actuality, consists of
Requests for Production pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 34, Interrogatories pursuant to Fed. R. Civ.
P. 33, and Requests for Admission pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 36. Such discovery requests are
directed to the Defendants and require no action on the part of the court.
DATED at Denver, Colorado, this 7th day of January, 2016.
1
BY THE COURT:
s/Craig B. Shaffer
United States Magistrate Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?