Hutton v. Woodall

Filing 20

MINUTE ORDER granting 19 Plaintiff's Motion for Clarification. The Minute Order 14 entered on August 20, 2013 gave the correct docket entry but the wrong title of the motion. By Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 8/21/13.(mnfsl, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 13-cv-01338-BNB-KMT
REBECCA HUTTON,
Plaintiff,
v.
CHARLES P. WOODALL, IV,
Defendant.
______________________________________________________________________________
MINUTE ORDER
______________________________________________________________________________
Minute Order Entered by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland
This matter is before the Court on the Plaintiff’s Motion for Clarification [docket no.
19, filed August 21, 2013] (the “Motion”).
IT IS ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED. The Minute Order [14] entered on
August 20, 2013 gave the correct docket entry but the wrong title of the motion. The Minute
Order should read as follows:
This matter is before the Court on the Stipulated Motion for Extension of Time to
Complete F.R.C.P. 26F Conference and Consent to Reference to Magistrate Judge [docket
no. 11, filed August 19, 2013] (the “Motion”).
IT IS ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED. The Scheduling/Planning Conference, set
for September 6, 2013, and all related dates, will go forward as previously set.

DATED: August 21, 2013