Lewis v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Assoc. et al

Filing 104

FINAL JUDGMENT. ORDERED that judgment is hereby entered in favor of the defendants and against the plaintiff. ORDERED that defendants are AWARDED their costs, to be taxed by the Clerk of the Court pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d) (1) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 54.1 by Clerk on 03/25/14. (jhawk, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 13-cv-01375-PAB-KLM
SHERRON L. LEWIS, JR.,
Plaintiff,
v.
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, NATIONAL ASSOC.,
LARRY CASTLE, in his individual and corporate capacity,
CINDY LOWERY-GRABER, and
THE CASTLE LAW GROUP, LLC,
Defendants.

FINAL JUDGMENT

In accordance with the orders filed during the pendency of this case, and
pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a), the following Final Judgment is hereby entered.
Pursuant to the Order [Docket No. 103] of U.S. District Judge Philip A. Brimmer
entered on March 24, 2014, it is
ORDERED that the Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix [Docket
No. 90] is ACCEPTED. It is further
ORDERED that Castle’s Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim [Docket
No. 31] is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. It is further
ORDERED that Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.’s Motion to Dismiss
Complaint for Damages, Injunctive Relief and Jury Demand Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.
12(b)(6) (Docket No. 1) [Docket No. 60] is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. It is
further

ORDERED that plaintiff’s second and fourth claims for relief are DISMISSED
with prejudice. It is further
ORDERED that plaintiff’s fifth claim for relief for violation of the FDCPA is
DISMISSED with prejudice. It is further
ORDERED that plaintiff’s sixth claim for relief for violation of the FDCPA by
defendant Chase is DISMISSED with prejudice. It is further
ORDERED that plaintiff’s sixth claim for relief for violation of § 1692e and
§ 1692f of the FDCPA against the Castle defendants is DISMISSED with prejudice. It is
further
ORDERED that plaintiff’s sixth claim for relief for violation of § 1692g of the
FDCPA against the Castle defendants is DISMISSED without prejudice. It is further
ORDERED that plaintiff’s state law claims are DISMISSED without prejudice. It
is further
ORDERED that judgment is hereby entered in favor of the defendants and
against the plaintiff. It is further
ORDERED that defendants are AWARDED their costs, to be taxed by the Clerk
of the Court pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d)(1) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 54.1. It is further
ORDERED that this case is dismissed in its entirety.

Dated at Denver, Colorado this 25th day of March, 2014.

FOR THE COURT:
JEFFREY P. COLWELL, CLERK
s/Kathy Preuitt-Parks
Kathy Preuitt-Parks
Deputy Clerk