Goodman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company

Filing 109

ORDER granting 108 the Parties Stipulated Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs First Claim for Relief with Prejudice. Each party shall pay her or its own related attorneys fees and costs. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs Second Claim (Alleged Bad Faith Breach of Insurance Contract) and Plaintiffs Third Claim for Relief (Alleged Statutory Damages) against Defendant remain pending before this Court, by Judge William J. Martinez on 5/28/2014.(evana, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge William J. Martínez Civil Case No. 13-cv-1376-WJM-MJW KIMBERLY GOODMAN Plaintiff, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY Defendant. ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF This matter comes before the Court on the Parties’ Stipulated Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s First Claim for Relief with Prejudice, filed May 28, 2014 (ECF No. 108). The Court having reviewed the Motion and being fully advised hereby ORDERS as follows: The Parties’ Stipulated Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. Plaintiff’s First Claim for Relief (Alleged Breach of Contract) against Defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Each party shall pay her or its own related attorney’s fees and costs. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Second Claim (Alleged Bad Faith Breach of Insurance Contract) and Plaintiff’s Third Claim for Relief (Alleged Statutory Damages) against Defendant remain pending before this Court. Dated this 28th day of May, 2014. BY THE COURT: _______________________ William J. Martínez United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?