Goodman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Filing
109
ORDER granting 108 the Parties Stipulated Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs First Claim for Relief with Prejudice. Each party shall pay her or its own related attorneys fees and costs. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs Second Claim (Alleged Bad Faith Breach of Insurance Contract) and Plaintiffs Third Claim for Relief (Alleged Statutory Damages) against Defendant remain pending before this Court, by Judge William J. Martinez on 5/28/2014.(evana, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge William J. Martínez
Civil Case No. 13-cv-1376-WJM-MJW
KIMBERLY GOODMAN
Plaintiff,
v.
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant.
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION TO DISMISS
PLAINTIFF’S FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF
This matter comes before the Court on the Parties’ Stipulated Motion to Dismiss
Plaintiff’s First Claim for Relief with Prejudice, filed May 28, 2014 (ECF No. 108). The
Court having reviewed the Motion and being fully advised hereby ORDERS as follows:
The Parties’ Stipulated Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. Plaintiff’s First Claim for
Relief (Alleged Breach of Contract) against Defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile
Insurance Company is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Each party shall pay
her or its own related attorney’s fees and costs.
It is FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Second Claim (Alleged Bad Faith
Breach of Insurance Contract) and Plaintiff’s Third Claim for Relief (Alleged Statutory
Damages) against Defendant remain pending before this Court.
Dated this 28th day of May, 2014.
BY THE COURT:
_______________________
William J. Martínez
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?