Thomas v. Timme et al
Filing
19
FINAL JUDGMENT by Clerk, re: 18 Order. By Clerk on 10/10/13. (mnfsl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge William J. Martínez
Civil Action No. 13-cv-01378-WJM
MACK THOMAS,
Applicant,
v.
RAE TIMME, Warden, and
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE THE STATE OF COLORADO,
Respondents.
FINAL JUDGMENT
Pursuant to and in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a), all Orders entered in
this case and the Order on Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 2254, entered by the Honorable William J. Martínez, United States District Judge, on
October 8, 2013,
IT IS ORDERED that
1.
Applicant Mack Thomas’s pro se Application for a Writ of Habeas
Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DENIED. Final Judgment
is entered for Respondents and against the Petitioner and this
action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
2.
No certificate of appealability will issue because Applicant has not
made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.
3.
In forma pauperis status is DENIED for the purpose of appeal. The
Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal
from this order would not be taken in good faith, see Coppedge v.
United States, 369 U.S. 438 (1962). If Applicant files a notice of
appeal he must also pay the full $455 appellate filing fee or file a
motion to proceed in forma pauperis in the United States Court of
Appeals for the Tenth Circuit within thirty days in accordance with
Fed. R. App. P. 24.
Dated at Denver, Colorado this 10th day of October 2013.
BY THE COURT:
JEFFREY P. COLWELL, CLERK
By: s/ Edward P. Butler
Edward P. Butler, Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?