Thomas v. Timme et al
Filing
3
ORDER To File Pre-Answer Response, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 5/29/13. (nmmsl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 13-cv-01378-BNB
MACK THOMAS,
Applicant,
v.
RAE TIMME, Warden, and
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO,
Respondents.
ORDER TO FILE PRE-ANSWER RESPONSE
As part of the preliminary consideration of the Application for a Writ of Habeas
Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 filed on May 28, 2013, in this action and pursuant
to Denson v. Abbott, 554 F. Supp. 2d 1206 (D. Colo. 2008), the Court has determined
that a limited Pre-Answer Response is appropriate. Respondents are directed pursuant
to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District
Courts to file a Pre-Answer Response limited to addressing the affirmative defenses of
timeliness under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d) and/or exhaustion of state court remedies under
28 U.S.C. § 2254(b)(1)(A). If Respondents do not intend to raise either of these
affirmative defenses, they must notify the Court of that decision in the Pre-Answer
Response. Respondents may not file a dispositive motion as their Pre-Answer
Response, or an Answer, or otherwise address the merits of the claims in response to
this Order.
In support of the Pre-Answer Response, Respondents should attach as exhibits
all relevant portions of the state court record, including but not limited to copies of all
documents demonstrating whether this action is filed in a timely manner and/or whether
Applicant has exhausted state court remedies.
Applicant may reply to the Pre-Answer Response and provide any information
that might be relevant to the one-year limitation period under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)
and/or the exhaustion of state court remedies. Applicant also should include
information relevant to equitable tolling, specifically as to whether he has pursued his
claims diligently and whether some extraordinary circumstance prevented him from
filing a timely 28 U.S.C. § 2254 action in this Court. Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that within twenty-one (21) days from the date of this Order
Respondent The Attorney General of the State of Colorado shall file a Pre-Answer
Response that complies with this Order. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that within twenty-one (21) days of the filing of the PreAnswer Response Applicant may file a Reply, if he desires. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that if Respondents do not intend to raise either of the
affirmative defenses of timeliness or exhaustion of state court remedies, the
Respondent Attorney General of the State of Colorado must notify the Court of that
decision in the Pre-Answer Response. It is
Dated at Denver, Colorado, on May 29, 2013.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Boyd N. Boland
United States Magistrate Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?