Moradi et al v. Estate of Everett Leroy Pfeiff et al
Filing
123
ORDER SUA SPONTE ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSING CASE: The Parties' 122 Joint Motion to Extend Time for Parties to File Dismissal Papers is DENIED. This matter be ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSED pursuant to local rule D.C.COLO.LCivR 41.2. The parties may move to reopen this case once settlement and dismissal papers have been finalized, or for any other good cause shown. By Judge William J. Martinez on 1/23/2015. (alowe)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge William J. Martínez
Civil Action No. 13-cv-1447-WJM-KLM
ISAAC MORADI, individually and as trustee for the Moradi Family Trust,
FOROUGH MORADI, as trustee for the Saeed and Forough Moradi Family Trust,
MIKE MORADI,
KATINA MORADI,
ALBERT MORADI,
CAROLINE MORADI,
I&J PARTNERSHIP, LP, and
610 SOUTH MAIN, LLC,
Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendants,
v.
ESTATE OF EVERETT LEROY PFEIFF, and
LINDA PFEIFF, individually and as personal representative of the Estate of Everett Leroy
Pfeiff,
Defendants, and
OLDE WORLD DEVELOPMENT, LLC.,
Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff.
ORDER SUA SPONTE ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSING CASE
In August 2014, the parties jointly moved to extend certain deadlines in the
Court’s scheduling order for the purposes of allowing them to pursue mediation. (ECF
No. 117.) The Court granted that request, which effectively stayed the case. (ECF No.
119.) After mediation was conducted in November 2014, the parties filed a Notice of
Settlement stating that, at a mediation on October 20, 2014, Plaintiffs, Defendants, and
proposed Third Party Defendants had “reached a full and final settlement of all claims
and defenses.” (ECF No. 120.) The parties stated that they would file a joint motion to
dismiss upon completion of the settlement documents. (Id.) On December 2, 2014, the
Court vacated all remaining deadlines in the case and ordered that the parties to file
dismissal documents by January 23, 2015. (ECF No. 121.)
On January 21, 2015, the parties filed a Joint Motion to Extend Time for Parties to
File Dismissal Papers (“Motion”). (ECF No. 122.) The Motion states that the parties
“have been diligently negotiating and preparing the settlement documents” and that,
while they have “made significant progress”, the final documents will not be finalized by
January 23, 2015. (Id.) The parties seek a one month extension of their deadline to file
dismissal paperwork. (Id.)
Given the above, the Court declines to grant the requested relief but will instead
sua sponte administratively close the case. This case has effectively been stayed since
August 2014, which has prevented the Court from ruling on any outstanding motions,
some of which have been pending for nearly a year. The parties reached a settlement of
this case in October, and despite having more than three months to finalize settlement
documents, have been unable to do so, and the Court is unable to discern from the
record when this period of delay will come to an end. Moreover, at this point, it appears
there is no live dispute regarding the merits of the claims at issue in this case, and that
the case is simply awaiting the parties’ final agreement on the settlement documents.
Accordingly, the Court ORDERS as follows:
1.
The Parties’ Joint Motion to Extend Time for Parties to File Dismissal Papers
(ECF No. 122) is DENIED; and
2.
This matter be ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSED pursuant to local rule
D.C.COLO.LCivR 41.2. The parties may move to reopen this case once
2
settlement and dismissal papers have been finalized, or for any other good cause
shown.
Dated this 23rd day of January, 2015.
BY THE COURT:
William J. Martínez
United States District Judge
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?