Moradi et al v. Estate of Everett Leroy Pfeiff et al

Filing 91

MINUTE ORDER STRIKING 85 Defendants' Motion for Order for Determination as to Whether Attorney-Client and Work-Product Privileges Attach to Plaintiffs Communications With and Files of Attorney Cameron Grant ;and DENYING AS MOOT < /b> 89 Stipulated Motion for Extension of Time for Plaintiffs to Respond to Defendants Motion for Determination as to Whether Attorney-Client and Work- Product Privileges Attach to Plaintiffs Communications With and Files of Attorney Cameron Grant, by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 5/9/2014.(evana, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 13-cv-01447-WJM-KLM
ISAAC MORADI, individually and as trustee for the Moradi Family Trust,
FOROUGH MORADI, as trustee for the Saeed and Forough Moradi Family Trust,
MIKE MORADI,
YEHOUDA MORADI,
KATINA MORADI,
ALBERT MORADI,
CAROLINE MORADI,
I & J PARTNERSHIP, LP, and
610 SOUTH MAIN, LLC
Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendants,
v.
ESTATE OF EVERETT LEROY PFEIFF,
LINDA PFEIFF, individually,
Defendants, and
OLDE WORLD DEVELOPMENT, LLC, and
LINDA PFEIFF, as personal representative of the estate of Everett Leroy Pfeiff,
Defendants/Counterclaim Plaintiffs.
_____________________________________________________________________
MINUTE ORDER
______________________________________________________________________
ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX
This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion for Determination as to
Whether Attorney-Client and Work-Product Privileges Attach to Plaintiffs’
Communications With and Files of Attorney Cameron Grant [#85]1 (the “Motion”) and
the parties’ Stipulated Motion for Extension of Time for Plaintiffs to Respond to
Defendants’ Motion for Determination as to Whether Attorney-Client and WorkProduct Privileges Attach to Plaintiffs’ Communications With and Files of Attorney

1

“[#85]” is an example of the convention the Court uses to identify the docket number
assigned to a specific paper by the Court’s case management and electronic case filing system
(CM/ECF). The Court uses this convention throughout this Minute Order.

1

Cameron Grant [#89] (the “Extension Motion”).
The Motion involves a disputed discovery issue. Accordingly, the parties must follow
the Court’s Discovery Dispute Hearing Procedures, which are available on the Court’s
website. Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion [#85] is STRICKEN and the Extension
Motion [#89] is DENIED as moot.
Dated: May 9, 2014

2