DHR International Inc. v. Pollick et al
Filing
46
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 10/21/13. (bnbcd, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 1:13-CV-01477-CMA-BNB
DHR INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Plaintiff.
DEBRA POLLICK and
BATTALIA WINSTON INTERNATIONAL, INC.,
Defendants.
____________________________________________________________________
PROTECTIVE ORDER
____________________________________________________________________
WHEREAS, the parties to the above litigation may produce in discovery confidential
information within the meaning of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c) (“Confidential
Material”); and
WHEREAS, it has been agreed by and among the parties, through their respective
counsel, that a protective order preserving the confidentiality of documents and information
produced in this litigation should be entered by the Court; and
WHEREAS, the Court has reviewed the terms and conditions of the protective order
submitted by the parties (the “Protective Order”);
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1.
Any of the parties to this action or any witness from whom discovery is sought in
this action may designate as Confidential Material any documents or information that the
producing party believes contains confidential information as defined by Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 26(c). Confidential Material shall remain confidential and shall not be used except in
the prosecution, defense or settlement of this action, including appeals related to this action.
Confidential Material shall not be used or shown, disseminated, copied, or in any way
communicated, orally, in writing, or otherwise, to anyone for any other purpose.
2.
Confidential status may be claimed for documents and information contained
therein either by stamping or writing “confidential” on them prior to their production or by
providing counsel for the inspecting party with a written description of the documents for which
confidential treatment is desired. The parties may designate documents as confidential prior to
the entry of this Protective Order and, upon entry of the order, such documents shall be
considered Confidential Material and be governed by the provisions of this Protective Order.
3.
Nothing in this Protective Order shall be construed as an agreement, concession
or admission by any party that documents designated as Confidential Material pursuant to this
Protective Order are otherwise confidential or proprietary. The designation of any documents or
information as Confidential Material may be challenged by any party by motion to the Court.
4.
A party may object to the designation of particular Confidential Material by
giving written notice to the party designating the disputed information. The written notice
shall identify the information to which the objection is made. If the parties cannot resolve
the objection within ten (10) business days after the time the notice is received, it shall be
the obligation of the party designating the information as Confidential Material to file an
appropriate motion requesting that the court determine whether the disputed information
should be subject to the terms of this Protective Order. If such a motion is timely filed, the
disputed information shall be treated as Confidential Material under the terms of this
Protective Order until the Court rules on the motion. If the designating party fails to file
2
such a motion within the prescribed time, the disputed information shall lose its
designation as Confidential Material and shall not thereafter be treated as Confidential
Material in accordance with this Protective Order. In connection with a motion filed
under this provision, the party designating the information as Confidential Material shall
bear the burden of establishing that good cause exists for the disputed information to be
treated as Confidential Material.
5.
Confidential Material may be disclosed to the Court and to other persons whose
assistance is required by counsel for the parties in conducting this litigation, but only to the
parties, those persons regularly employed by counsel for the inspecting party, persons assisting
such counsel in this litigation, or any regular employee of such counsel to whom it is necessary
that the documents or information be shown for purposes of this litigation. The parties may
designate certain Confidential Material as “Attorney Eyes Only,” which status can be challenged
as set forth above. Such a designation restricts access to this Confidential Material as set forth
above, except that it cannot be shared with the parties without the written consent of the
disclosing party’s counsel.
6.
Counsel for the parties may also disclose or discuss Confidential Material, or any
contents thereof, to or with witnesses and prospective witnesses and persons employed by the
inspecting party or counsel to assist in the preparation of this case for trial, such as experts, on
the condition that (i) all persons to whom the disclosure of confidential information is made
under this paragraph are made fully aware of the terms of this Protective Order and understand
that use of any information contained in Confidential Material is strictly limited to litigation of
this case; and (ii) prior to disclosure by the inspecting party or counsel of the Confidential
3
Material pursuant to this paragraph, a copy of this Protective Order shall be presented to the
person to whom such document(s) or information are to be disclosed, who shall sign it or
otherwise signify in writing that he or she has been advised that a violation of this Protective
Order may subject him or her to sanctions for contempt of Court, and that he or she consents to
be bound by the terms of this Protective Order.
7.
If the answer to any interrogatory, request for production of documents, or request
for admission requires the disclosure of Confidential Material, that answer shall be stamped
“confidential.” Such answer shall be handled in the same manner as any other Confidential
Material of that designation.
8.
Portions of any depositions where any confidential information is used or referred
to shall be taken only in the presence of those authorized under this Order to have access to such
confidential information. The transcript or portions of such depositions containing confidential
information shall be stamped confidential and handled in the same manner as other Confidential
Material of that designation.
9.
At the conclusion of the proceedings of this action, all Confidential Materials
produced pursuant to this Protective Order and all copies, excerpts, or extracts (excluding
excerpts or extracts incorporated into any privileged memoranda of the parties), except for such
material which has become part of the record in this action, shall be returned or destroyed as
agreed at the time by counsel for the parties.
10.
In the event that a party intends to use Confidential Material in a brief or
document filed with the Court, the party shall notify the other party and identify the Confidential
Material at least 5 business days in advance of filing the Confidential Material with the Court, so
4
that the other party has an opportunity to petition the Court to seal the Confidential Material
according to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Regardless of whether or not the filing party
complies with the notice provisions of this paragraph, the other party shall have the opportunity
to request that the Court seal Confidential Material filed with the Court through an appropriate
motion. Any request to restrict access must comply with the requirements of
D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.2.
11.
No paper shall be filed under seal without Court Order specifically authorizing
the same under D.C. COLO. LCivR 7.2. The Clerk of the Court shall maintain under seal all
such sealed documents and make them available only to the Court and to counsel for the parties
to this proceeding until further order of this Court.
12.
At the trial of this action or at any hearing relating to this action before any
judicial officer, a party may, subject to the rules of evidence and the order of the Court, use any
Confidential Material for any purpose, provided that counsel for the party producing such
material is given an opportunity to be heard prior to the disclosure of the Confidential Material.
13.
Nothing contained herein shall be construed to prejudice any party’s right to use
any document or information for purposes of further discovery. Counsel may make and use a
photocopy of a document or information designated as Confidential Material if such copy (a) is
retained in counsel’s possession and is made for counsel’s internal use only; (b) is to be used for
purposes of disclosure pursuant to paragraph 6 hereof; (c) is to be identified in a deposition or
used as a deposition exhibit; or (d) is to be used at any hearing or trial in this case. In any such
situation, the parties shall take reasonable steps to maintain the confidential nature of the
document or information.
5
14.
This Protective Order shall be binding upon the parties to this action and any
witness who has access to confidential documents or information. The parties shall request that
any witness with access to confidential information or documents evidence his or her agreement
to be bound by the terms of this Protective Order by signing a copy of the Protective Order and
returning it to counsel of record in this matter. This Protective Order may also be used to protect
Confidential Materials asserted as such by any non-party witness who produces such materials
pursuant to a subpoena or otherwise in discovery in this matter. In the event that such witness
asserts that documents or information sought of him or her in discovery are confidential, the
party seeking such discovery shall provide a copy of this Protective Order to the witness. Such
witness shall evidence his or her agreement to be bound by the terms of this Protective Order in
order to produce documents or information in discovery as Confidential Material, by signing a
copy of this Protective Order and returning it to counsel for the party seeking such discovery,
who shall file it with the Clerk and serve it upon opposing counsel. The parties may also mark
any documents received from any witness as confidential, subject to the terms and procedures
outlined in this Agreement.
15.
This Protective Order may be construed or modified by the Court, on application
of either party or any witness or on the Court's own initiative, to ensure the adjudication of all
issues in this action in light of all relevant and material facts without publishing or otherwise
destroying the value of Confidential Materials.
16.
Any confidential information should be placed, to the extent possible, in exhibits
which can be removed from papers being filed and retained by the submitting party.
6
17.
Nothing herein shall prohibit the disclosure of any documents or information to
public officials for law enforcement purposes.
18.
Inadvertent production of privileged or arguably privileged materials under this
order shall not be deemed to be either a general waiver of the attorney-client privilege, the work
product doctrine, or any other privileges, or a specific waiver of any such privilege.
SO ORDERED,
Dated October 21, 2013.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Boyd N. Boland
United States Magistrate Judge
7
SO STIPULATED:
s/Brian G. Dershaw
Brian G. Dershaw
Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
425 Walnut Street, Suite 1800
Cincinnati, OH 45202-3957
Richard A. Westfall
Aaron Solomon
Hale Westfall, LLP
1445 Market Street, Suite 300
Denver, CO 80202
Attorneys for Plaintiff DHR International, Inc.
s/David J. Schaller
David J. Schaller
Stephanie A. Reedy
Wheeler Trigg O'Donnell LLP
370 Seventeenth Street, Suite 4500
Denver, Colorado 80202
Attorneys for Defendant Debra Pollick
s/William R. Dabney
William R. Dabney
John M. Husband
Holland & Hart, LLP
P.O. Box 8749
555 17th Street #3200
Denver, CO 80201-8749
Attorneys for Defendant
Battalia Winston International, Inc.
8
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?