USA v. Goldston et al

Filing 35

MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 5/19/14 Granting Stipulation Regarding Contingent Interest of James and Janet Senneker 30 . IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Janet Senneker and Defendant James Senneker are relieved from furth er participation until such time as the Court considers arguments on the disposition of the subject property. However, Defendant Janet Senneker and Defendant James Senneker shall respond to discovery requests, should any be directed to them in this case. (lgale)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 13-cv-01565-RM-KLM
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
v.
DAVID W. GOLDSTON, individually and as trustee of Old Times Holding Trust and High
Mountain Holding Trust,
NANCY S. GOLDSTON, individually and as trustee of Old Times Holding Trust and High
Mountain Holding Trust,
JANET SENNEKER,
JAMES SENNEKER, and
W.W. INVESTMENT GROUP, LLC, as trustee of Old Times Holding Trust and High
Mountain Holding Trust,
Defendants.
_____________________________________________________________________
MINUTE ORDER
_____________________________________________________________________
ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX
This matter is before the Court on the parties’ Stipulation Regarding Contingent
Interest of James and Janet Senneker [#30]1 that was filed as a motion (the “Motion”).
In the Motion, the parties state their agreement regarding Defendant Janet Senneker’s and
Defendant James Senneker’s interest in the subject property. Based on the agreement of
the parties,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion [#30] is GRANTED. Accordingly,
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Janet Senneker and Defendant James
Senneker are relieved from further participation until such time as the Court considers
arguments on the disposition of the subject property. However, Defendant Janet Senneker
and Defendant James Senneker shall respond to discovery requests, should any be
directed to them in this case.
Dated: May 19, 2014
1

“[#30]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to
a specific paper by the Court’s case management and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). I
use this convention throughout this Minute Order.