USA v. Goldston et al
Filing
76
ORDER approving 75 Stipulation for the Disbursement of Remaining Proceeds, filed by First Pinkston Limited Partnership. By Judge Raymond P. Moore on 9/8/2015. (mlace, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Raymond P. Moore
Civil Action No. 13–cv–01565–RM–KLM
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
v.
DAVID W. GOLDSTON, individually and as Trustee
of Old Times Holding Trust and Trustee of High Mountain Holding Trust;
NANCY S. GOLDSTON, individually and as Trustee
of Old Times Holding Trust and Trustee of High Mountain Holding Trust;
JANET SENNEKER;
JAMES SENNEKER;
W.W. INVESTMENT GROUP, LLC, as
Trustee of Old Times Holding Trust and
Trustee of High Mountain Holding Trust;
FIRST PINKSTON L.P.; and
GUNNISON COUNTY,
Defendants.
______________________________________________________________________________
ORDER
______________________________________________________________________________
This matter is before the Court on the Stipulation for the Disbursement of Remaining
Proceeds from Sale of Lot 2 (“Stipulation”) (ECF No. 75) whereby Plaintiff the United States of
America, Defendant First Pinkston, L.P., and Defendant Gunnison County have stipulated to the
disbursement of approximately $27,500.00 in sale proceeds from the sale of Davenport Ranch,
Lot 2, in Gunnison County, Colorado. Defendant First Pinkston, L.P. certifies that the Senneker
Defendants do not object to the Stipulation while the Goldston Defendants did not respond to an
inquiry regarding their position as to the Stipulation. Upon consideration of the Stipulation, and
the representations by the parties therein, and the Court file, and being otherwise fully advised,
the Stipulation is APPROVED and SO ORDERED by this Court.
DATED this 8th day of September, 2015.
BY THE COURT:
____________________________________
RAYMOND P. MOORE
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?