Denison v. Colorado Department of Corrections et al

Filing 90

ORDER. ORDERED that plaintiff Jeremy Nechol Denison may send an initial written settlement offer to defendants on or before November 20, 2014. ORDERED that, on or before December 1, 2014, defendants shall notify the Court whether they are willing t o participate in a settlement conference with the assigned magistrate judge. ORDERED that the Court will not rule on plaintiffs Motion Requesting Order for Settlement Hearing [Docket No. 86] until on or after December 1, 2014 by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 11/07/14. (jhawk, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Philip A. Brimmer
Civil Action No. 13-cv-01584-PAB-MEH
JEREMY NECHOL DENISON,
Plaintiff,
v.
CORRECTIONAL HEALTH PARTNERS, Utilization Mgmt Comm.,
NEAL LOUSBERG, CSP Medical Provider,
KATHLEEN BOYD, CSP Medical Provider, and
Defendants.
_____________________________________________________________________
ORDER
_____________________________________________________________________
This matter comes before the Court on the Motion Requesting Order for
Settlement Hearing [Docket No. 86], filed by plaintiff Jeremy Nechol Denison. The
plaintiff is pro se. The Court construes the motion as a request pursuant to Local Rule
16.6(a) for the Court to authorize the assigned magistrate judge to conduct a settlement
conference in this case. Mr. Denison is currently a prisoner being housed in the
Arkansas Valley Correctional Facility of the Colorado Bureau of Prisons.
Both the state defendants and defendant Correctional Health Partners have
indicated that their willingness to participate in settlement negotiations facilitated by the
magistrate judge is dependent upon their evaluation of an initial written settlement offer
by Mr. Denison. See Docket Nos. 88 and 89. In light of that fact, it is
ORDERED that plaintiff Jeremy Nechol Denison may send an initial written
settlement offer to defendants on or before November 20, 2014. It is further

ORDERED that, on or before December 1, 2014, defendants shall notify the
Court whether they are willing to participate in a settlement conference with the
assigned magistrate judge. It is further
ORDERED that the Court will not rule on plaintiff’s Motion Requesting Order for
Settlement Hearing [Docket No. 86] until on or after December 1, 2014.

DATED November 7, 2014.
BY THE COURT:

s/Philip A. Brimmer
PHILIP A. BRIMMER
United States District Judge

2