Datalink Corporation v. Prata et al
Filing
46
COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer: Motion Hearing held on 11/15/2013. ORDERED: 26 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint is GRANTED. The Amended Complaint is accept ed for filing as of today's date. ORDERED: Defendants' 14 Motion to Dismiss or in the Alternative Motion for More Definite Statement and 16 Motion to Dismiss or in the Alternative Motion for More Definite Statement and Memorandum Brief in Support are DENIED as moot. FTR: Courtroom A402 - C. Covington. (ccovi)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer
Civil Action: 13-cv-01591-CMA-CBS
Date:
November 15, 2013
FTR - Reporter Deck - Courtroom A402
Courtroom Deputy: Courtni Covington
Parties:
Counsel:
DATALINK CORPORATION,
John M. Husband
Plaintiff,
v.
PAUL PRATA, et al.,
Jennifer L. Lorenz
Gregory R. Stross
Defendants.
COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER
HEARING: MOTION HEARING
Court in session:
8:30 a.m.
Court calls case. Appearances of counsel.
This matter is before the court regarding Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File an Amended
Complaint [Doc. No. 26] and Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss or in the Alternative Motion for
More Definite Statement [Doc. Nos. 14 and 16].
The court begins with Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint [Doc. No. 26].
Counsel for Plaintiff states he has no additional argument.
Counsel for Defendant Net Source, Inc presents oral argument and addresses issues also raised in
his Motion to Dismiss.
Counsel for Defendant Paula Prata presents oral argument, addresses issues raised in the Motions
to Dismiss, and engages in discussion with the court.
The court notes if Plaintiff’s Motion is granted, then the Motions to Dismiss will be rendered moot.
The court reviews the chronology of the case, cites relevant decisions and case law, and makes
findings.
ORDERED:
For the reasons stated on the record, Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File an
Amended Complaint [Doc. No. 26, filed 9/24/2013] is GRANTED.
Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint is accepted for filing as of today’s date.
ORDERED:
Defendant Paul Prata’s Motion to Dismiss or in the Alternative Motion for
More Definite Statement [Doc. No. 16, filed 8/19/2013] and Defendant Net
Source, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss or in the Alternative Motion for More
Definite Statement and Memorandum Brief in Support of all Motions
[Doc. No. 14, filed 8/19/2013] are DENIED as moot.
The court notes it is respecting in all ways the Defendants’ rights to raise any challenges to the
Amended Complaint, to the extent they choose to and to the extent the law permits them to, at the
time they think is appropriate.
HEARING CONCLUDED.
Court in recess:
9:30 a.m.
Total time in court: 01:00
To order transcripts of hearings with Magistrate Judge Shaffer, please contact Avery Woods Reporting at (303)
825-6119 or toll free at 1-800-962-3345.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?