Stevenson v. Schneider Electric USA, Inc.

Filing 105

COURTROOM MINUTES for Motion Hearing held on 2/27/2015 before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya. ORDERED: Plaintiff's Motion for One-Day Extension on Expedited Briefing Schedule 98 is GRANTED. Mr. Beecher is ORDERED to attend a formal tra ining session in CM/ECF through the Clerks Office of the United States District Court for the District of Colorado within the next 30 days. A status report shall be filed afterwards indicating the particulars of his attendance and certifying the s ame. Defendant's Motion for Protective Order and Request for Expedited Briefing 93 is DENIED. Discovery is relevant under Rule 26 and a stay is not in place in the case. District Judge Brimmer will decide the propriety of a stay on discovery. Defendant's Motion to Compel Discovery Responses and for Expenses 80 is GRANTED IN PART. FTR: KMT C201. (sgrim)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya
Civil Action No:
Courtroom Deputy:

13-cv-01609-PAB-KMT
Sabrina Grimm

Date: February 27, 2015
FTR: Courtroom C-201

Parties:

Counsel:

TRACY LYNN STEVENSON,

Norman Beecher (by telephone)

Plaintiff,
v.
SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC U.S.A., INC.,

Jennifer Harpole
Darren Nadel

Defendant.

COURTROOM MINUTES

MOTION HEARING
10:03 a.m.

Court in session.

Court calls case. Appearances of counsel.
Also present on the phone, Plaintiff Tracy Stevenson.
ORDERED: Plaintiff’s Motion for One-Day Extension on Expedited Briefing Schedule
[98] is GRANTED. Mr. Beecher is ORDERED to attend a formal training
session in CM/ECF through the Clerk’s Office of the United States District
Court for the District of Colorado within the next 30 days. A status report
shall be filed afterwards indicating the particulars of his attendance and
certifying the same.
Discussion and argument regarding litigating the garnishment claims, state court case with
respect to the garnishment claims, and Plaintiff’s surreply [103].
ORDERED: Defendant’s Motion for Protective Order and Request for Expedited Briefing
[93] is DENIED. Discovery is relevant under Rule 26 and a stay is not in
place in the case. District Judge Brimmer will decide the propriety of a stay
on discovery.

Discussion and argument regarding Plaintiff’s privilege log, fiduciary duties, damage
calculations, documents with respect to the medical release, and medical expenses.
ORDERED: Defendant’s Motion to Compel Discovery Responses and for Expenses [80] is
GRANTED IN PART.




Interrogatory 7 – Plaintiff shall provide a supplementation, as
discussed, on or before March 13, 2015.



Interrogatory 14 – Plaintiff shall provide a full calculation of damages
for the case as of February 27, 2015 to the extent possible, as
discussed, on or before March 13, 2015.



11:01 a.m.

Plaintiff shall provide a written update to the 2/20/12 entry on the
privilege log and follow up with Defendant’s counsel, as discussed, by
March 3, 2015.

Interrogatory 17 – Defendant shall produce documents to Plaintiff
with respect to the medical release on or before close of business
March 2, 2015. Plaintiff shall provide Defendant with an itemization
of medical expenses on or before March 13, 2015.

Court in recess.

Hearing concluded.
Total in-court time 00:58
*To obtain a transcript of this proceeding, please contact Avery Woods Reporting at [phone].

2