Scheef & Stone, L.L.P. et al v. Foels

Filing 48

MINUTE ORDER granting 47 Plaintiffs' Unopposed Motion ForReconsideration of Order Striking #42, Motion to Exclude or Limit ExpertTestimony Under Rule 702 and Brief in Support, and Denying Without Prejudice#43 Motion For Leave to Restrict Acce ss to #42. Plaintiffs' Motion to Exclude or Limit Expert Testimony Under Rule 702 and Brief in Support [# 42 ] and Plaintiffs' Scheef & Stone, L.L.P. and Grady Dickens Unopposed Motion to Restrict Access to Document #42 [# 43 ] are RE-INSTATED. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 5/2/2014.(klyon, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Robert E. Blackburn Civil Action No. 13-cv-01611-REB-CBS SHEEF & STONE, LLP, and GRADY DICKENS, Plaintiffs, v. SUSANNA E. FOELS, Defendant. MINUTE ORDER1 The matter is before the court on Plaintiffs’ Unopposed Motion For Reconsideration of Order Striking #42, Motion to Exclude or Limit Expert Testimony Under Rule 702 and Brief in Support, and Denying Without Prejudice #43 Motion For Leave to Restrict Access to #42 [#47]2 filed May 1, 2014. After reviewing the motion and the record, the court has concluded that the motion should be granted. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows: 1. That Plaintiffs’ Unopposed Motion For Reconsideration of Order Striking #42, Motion to Exclude or Limit Expert Testimony Under Rule 702 and Brief in Support, and Denying Without Prejudice #43 Motion For Leave to Restrict Access to #42 [#47] filed May 1, 2014, is GRANTED; 2. That Plaintiffs’ Motion to Exclude or Limit Expert Testimony Under Rule 1 This minute order is issued pursuant to the express authority of the Honorable Robert E. Blackburn, United States District Judge for the District of Colorado. 2 “[#47]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific paper by the court’s case management and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). I use this convention throughout this order. 702 and Brief in Support3 [#42] is RE-INSTATED; and 3. That Plaintiffs’ Scheef & Stone, L.L.P. and Grady Dickens Unopposed Motion to Restrict Access to Document #42 [#43] is RE-INSTATED. Dated: May 2, 2014 3 In light of the length of plaintiffs' motion, the court will entertain at the appropriate time any motion by defendant seeking an extension of the 15-page limitation which applies to responses to any motion other than a motions for summary judgment. See REB Civ. Practice Standard IV.B.1. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?